/

Celer Network

  • What it is:Celer Network is a layer-2 blockchain interoperability protocol enabling one-click cross-chain access to tokens, DeFi, GameFi, NFTs, and more across multiple chains.
  • Best for:Cross-chain gaming platforms, Payment dApps requiring instant settlement, Multi-chain DeFi protocols
  • Pricing:Free tier available, paid plans from Stake CELR tokens
  • Rating:75/100Good
  • Expert's conclusion:Celer Network is a mature state channel solution that provides enterprise-grade state channel infrastructure for technical teams that are developing cross-chain based applications.
Visit website
Reviewed byMaxim Manylov·Web3 Engineer & Serial Founder

What Is Celer Network and What Does It Do?

Celer Network is a top layer-2 blockchain scaling and interoperability platform providing fast, secure, and affordable off-blockchain transactions to facilitate transactions on other blockchains. The platform also offers tools for cross-chain asset exchanges, dApps, DeFi, NFTs, and more, supporting both developers and end-users in the Web3 community.

Active
📍Singapore
📅Founded 2018
🏢Private
TARGET SEGMENTS
Blockchain DevelopersDeFi UsersGameFi ProjectsNFT Platforms

What Are Celer Network's Key Business Metrics?

📊
$150K
Total Funding Raised
🔄
$1B+
cBridge Transaction Volume
🏢
11-50
Employees
📊
2018
Founding Year
📊
Challenger in Layer-2 scaling
Market Position

How Credible and Trustworthy Is Celer Network?

75/100
Good

A top established Layer-2 player that has demonstrated success with cross-chain transaction volumes and has an active development pipeline, however has limited disclosed funding or metrics.

BREAKDOWN
Product Maturity85/100
Company Stability70/100
Security & Compliance80/100
User Reviews65/100
Transparency75/100
Support Quality70/100
TRUST SIGNALS
cBridge $1B+ transaction volumeBacked by Binance Labs, 500 AcceleratorMainnet Inter-chain Messaging Framework launchedChallenger status in Layer-2 scaling per CB Insights

What is the history of Celer Network and its key milestones?

2018

Company Founded

Developed as a Layer-2 scaling platform for fast, secure blockchain transactions.

2019

First Generalized State Channel Network

Introduced the world’s first generalized state channel network.

2021

cBridge Launch

Released cBridge allowing instant low-cost cross-chain transfers.

2022

cBridge $1B Milestone

cBridge exceeded $1 billion in cross-chain transaction volume.

2023

Inter-chain Message Framework Mainnet

Introduced the mainnet Inter-chain messaging (ICM) framework for the creation of multi-chain dApps.

What Are the Key Features of Celer Network?

✨
cBridge
Offered a one-click process for transferring cross-chain tokens with instant transfer and low cost options across 30+ chains.
✨
Inter-chain Messaging
Established a mainnet framework to enable seamless communication between multi-chain dApps.
✨
Generalized State Channels
Developed the world’s first generalized state channel network for off-blockchain scaling.
✨
One-tx Cross-chain Swaps
Allows execution of cross-chain token swaps in a single transaction with minimum slippage.
✨
Cross-chain NFT Bridging
Provides for seamless NFT transfers, bidding, purchasing, and collateralization across chains.
✨
Cross-chain Yield Farming
Provided unified liquidity provision and yield optimization across multiple blockchains.
🔗
Layer2.finance Integration
Provided built-in DeFi middleware for cross-chain financial applications.

What Technology Stack and Infrastructure Does Celer Network Use?

Infrastructure

Multi-chain with off-chain computation layers

Technologies

SolidityRustState ChannelsRollupsZero-Knowledge Proofs

Integrations

EthereumLayer2sBSCPolygonArbitrumOptimism30+ Chains

Inferred from Layer-2 scaling and state channel documentation

What Are the Best Use Cases for Celer Network?

DeFi Developers
Enables cross-chain yield farming, liquidity pools, and lending protocols with seamless asset bridging.
GameFi Studios
Enabling metaverse gaming by utilizing NFT assets and tokens from multiple blockchains simultaneously.
NFT Marketplaces
Supports cross-chain NFT bidding, purchasing, and collateralization across 30+ networks.
DAO Governance Teams
Implemented cross-chain governance voting and treasury management across member-held chains.
High-Frequency Traders
Enabled instant cross-chain arbitrage with one-tx swaps and minimal slippage.
Retail Token Traders
Enabled low-cost bridging and swaps between any supported chains with one-click user experience.
NOT FORHighly Regulated Institutions
LIMITED – Does not have some of the same regulatory requirements as a financial institution (traditional) and does not have many of the Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements that most institutions must follow (21).
NOT FORSingle-Chain Maximalists
DOES NOT NEED IT – Already using one blockchain environment (22).

How Much Does Celer Network Cost and What Plans Are Available?

Pricing information with service tiers, costs, and details
☐Service$CostℹDetails🔗Source
State Guardian Network ParticipationStake CELR tokensRequired to run validator nodes and provide layer-2 servicesOfficial documentation
Off-chain Service Provider (OSP)Capital reserves in target tokensOpen channels with multiple peers to relay paymentsCelerCore documentation
cBridge TransfersGas fees + minimal bridge feeCross-chain transfers with low costs compared to on-chainCeler Network products
Client Node Usage$0Open single channel with OSP for off-chain transactionsCelerCore documentation
State Guardian Network ParticipationStake CELR tokens
Required to run validator nodes and provide layer-2 services
Official documentation
Off-chain Service Provider (OSP)Capital reserves in target tokens
Open channels with multiple peers to relay payments
CelerCore documentation
cBridge TransfersGas fees + minimal bridge fee
Cross-chain transfers with low costs compared to on-chain
Celer Network products
Client Node Usage$0
Open single channel with OSP for off-chain transactions
CelerCore documentation

How Does Celer Network Compare to Competitors?

FeatureCeler NetworkOptimismArbitrumPolygon zkEVM
Core TechnologyState Channels + RollupsOptimistic RollupOptimistic Rollupzk-Rollup
Cross-Chain Support43+ chainsLimitedLimitedLimited
Instant TransactionsYes (off-chain)No (7-day challenge)No (7-day challenge)Yes
Starting CostMinimal gas + CELR stakeGas feesGas feesGas fees
Free TierYes (client nodes)NoNoNo
API AvailabilityYesYesYesYes
Node OperationStake CELRRun sequencerRun validatorRun prover
Security ModelSGN + L1 securityL1 securityL1 securityZK proofs + L1
Wallet Support11 walletsMetaMask onlyMetaMask onlyMetaMask only
Token Support174 tokensETH onlyETH onlyETH + ERC20
Core Technology
Celer NetworkState Channels + Rollups
OptimismOptimistic Rollup
ArbitrumOptimistic Rollup
Polygon zkEVMzk-Rollup
Cross-Chain Support
Celer Network43+ chains
OptimismLimited
ArbitrumLimited
Polygon zkEVMLimited
Instant Transactions
Celer NetworkYes (off-chain)
OptimismNo (7-day challenge)
ArbitrumNo (7-day challenge)
Polygon zkEVMYes
Starting Cost
Celer NetworkMinimal gas + CELR stake
OptimismGas fees
ArbitrumGas fees
Polygon zkEVMGas fees
Free Tier
Celer NetworkYes (client nodes)
OptimismNo
ArbitrumNo
Polygon zkEVMNo
API Availability
Celer NetworkYes
OptimismYes
ArbitrumYes
Polygon zkEVMYes
Node Operation
Celer NetworkStake CELR
OptimismRun sequencer
ArbitrumRun validator
Polygon zkEVMRun prover
Security Model
Celer NetworkSGN + L1 security
OptimismL1 security
ArbitrumL1 security
Polygon zkEVMZK proofs + L1
Wallet Support
Celer Network11 wallets
OptimismMetaMask only
ArbitrumMetaMask only
Polygon zkEVMMetaMask only
Token Support
Celer Network174 tokens
OptimismETH only
ArbitrumETH only
Polygon zkEVMETH + ERC20

How Does Celer Network Compare to Competitors?

vs Optimism

CELER HAS A DIFFERENT APPROACH THAN OPTIMISM IN TERMS OF HOW THEY HANDLE OFF-CHAIN TRANSACTIONS. Celer has an instantaneous way of making off-chain payments using its state channel technology (instant), whereas Optimism has an optimistic rollup system that takes 7 days to make withdrawals (23). Celer also provides native support for over 43 different blockchain environments versus Optimism’s focus on Ethereum (24).

USE Celer for cross-chain payment transactions and Optimism for DeFi dApp scaling (29).

vs Arbitrum

THE TECHNOLOGY IS SIMILAR TO THAT USED BY OPTIMISM, BUT Celer also includes a layer of state channel technology to provide users with zero-gas interaction and access to multiple blockchains (optimistic rollups); whereas Arbitrum has a much larger DeFi ecosystem but doesn’t focus on cross-chain transactions (25).

USE Arbitrum when you need to scale your DeFi applications on Ethereum and Celer when you need to create cross-chain gaming or payments (30).

vs Polygon zkEVM

POLYGON PROVIDES CRYPTOGRAPHIC SECURITY PROOFS FOR ITS BLOCKCHAIN ENVIRONMENT VERSUS CELER WHICH USES ECONOMIC SECURITY THROUGH SGN STAKING; Additionally, Polygon is focused on providing security to the Polygon ecosystem while Celer is focused on providing chain interoperability to multiple ecosystems (26).

USE Polygon when you need to ensure that your transactions are finalized and Celer when you want to perform multi-chain state channel operations (31).

vs Loopring

BOTH USE STATE CHANNEL TECHNOLOGY BUT Celer is a generalized framework to build upon, whereas Loopring is a DEX-focused application (27). Celer can be used for a variety of L2 applications including payments/dApps/games and Loopring is specifically designed for order-book style trading (28).

USE Loopring if you need to trade assets on a DEX and Celer for other types of L2 applications (32).

What are the strengths and limitations of Celer Network?

Pros

  • STATE CHANNELS ENABLE INSTANT PAYMENTS WITH ZERO GAS COSTS (33).
  • MULTI-CHAIN SUPPORT – Currently supports 43 different blockchain environments with 174 tokens (34).
  • LOW COST – Much lower than L1 transaction costs (35).
  • FLEXIBLE FRAMEWORK – Uses a blockchain agnostic state channel protocol (36).
  • DECENTRALIZED SECURITY – Through CELR staking of the State Guardian Network (SGN) (37).
  • INTEROPERABILITY BETWEEN CHAINS – Using Celer’s cBridge, allows users to transfer their assets between chains seamlessly (38).
  • ZERO-DOWNTIME UPGRADES – Able to update each individual channel independently of others without affecting the rest of the network (39).

Cons

  • REQUIRES CELR STAKING – To participate in the SGN and to provide decentralized security (40).
  • MANAGING CHANNELS – Requires a basic understanding of how state channels work (41).
  • LIMITED MAINSTREAM ADOPTION – While newer, it is still behind more established roll-ups such as Optimism (42).
  • OFFLINE LIMITATIONS – Because they rely on having a peer online in order to make a payment (43).
  • Token dependency — CELR needed for network security and services
  • Complexity of developers — steeper learning curve than that of simple rollup systems
  • Capital reserves are required for the liquidity of channels — OSPs require capital reserves

Who Is Celer Network Best For?

Best For

  • Cross-chain gaming platforms — Payments across 43 chains can be made instantly, enabling seamless in-game economy models
  • Payment dApps requiring instant settlement — Zero-gas instant transactions can be made using state channels
  • Multi-chain DeFi protocols — cBridge allows liquidity between ecosystems without requiring wrapped tokens
  • Node operators seeking staking rewards — Staking opportunities exist for CELR in the State Guardian Network
  • dApps needing privacy-preserving transactions — Transactions remain private when state channels are used off-chain

Not Suitable For

  • Simple Ethereum dApps — Rollup systems such as Optimism or Arbitrum provide simpler onboarding processes for use cases dependent only upon Ethereum
  • High-throughput DeFi exchanges — zk-Rollups, such as those provided by Polygon, have stronger finality guarantees
  • Casual users avoiding node operation — Understanding of channels/staking vs the consumer-friendly nature of rollup systems is required
  • Projects avoiding utility tokens — CELR staking dependency vs pure ETH gas model

Are There Usage Limits or Geographic Restrictions for Celer Network?

State Guardian Network
CELR staking required for validators
Channel Liquidity
Peers must fund channels with target tokens
Online Requirement
OSP nodes must stay online for relay services
Supported Chains
43 chains (expanding)
Supported Tokens
174 tokens across supported chains
Wallet Support
11 wallets integrated
Off-chain Only
Mainnet requires L1 deposit for channel funding
Peer Dependencies
Requires counterparty cooperation for channels

Is Celer Network Secure and Compliant?

State Guardian Network (SGN)Decentralized watchtower network with CELR staking incentives and reputation system
Layer-1 Security InheritanceTrue L2 relying only on base layer blockchain economic security
Cryptoeconomic SecurityCELR staking penalizes malicious validators through slashing
Off-chain Challenge MechanismUsers can enforce latest state on L1 if counterparty cheats
Tendermint BFT ConsensusSGN uses Byzantine Fault Tolerant consensus for state validation
No Trusted Third PartiesPure P2P state channels with fraud proofs fallback to L1

What Customer Support Options Does Celer Network Offer?

Channels
info@celer.network for general inquiriesCommunity and Governance Forum for discussions and supportTechnical support via goCeler-oss repository issues
Specialized
Technical support for developers running OSP nodes
Support Limitations
•No phone or live chat support mentioned
•Primarily community-driven support
•Enterprise/business tier support details not publicly available

What APIs and Integrations Does Celer Network Support?

API Type
gRPC for state channel communication, REST endpoints for cBridge
Authentication
Certificates required for OSP connections, contact cert@celer.network
Web Proxy
Available for web client integration, runs on port 29980
SDKs
Go SDK available (goCeler-oss), CLI tools for OSP management
Documentation
Comprehensive developer docs for CelerCore, OSP setup, channel operations
CLI Tools
osp-cli for channel management, peer connections, on-chain operations
Protocol
Protobuf messages for cross-platform interoperability
Rate Limits
Not specified in public docs
Use Cases
State channel management, multi-hop payments, cross-chain bridging via cBridge

What Are Common Questions About Celer Network?

Celer Network provides a Layer-2 scaling solution utilizing state channels to enable fast and inexpensive blockchain transactions. It enables cross-chain operations through cBridge and state channel protocol optimizations.

cBridge is a decentralized asset bridge utilized by Celer for the transfer of tokens between 40+ blockchains and Layer-2 rollups. As of today, it has been used for over $14 billion in volume for more than 540,000 users.

Celer utilizes CelerPay for payment channels and CelerApp for all other application logic channels. Nodes communicate with each other utilizing OSP (Off-chain Service Provider) infrastructure for multi-hop payments.

Deploy goCeler-oss from GitHub. Configure OSP with profile.json, connect to peers via gRPC, and utilize osp-cli to manage channels.

cBridge currently supports 40+ blockchains and Layer-2 rollups. The full list of supported chains can be accessed on the cbridge.celer.network interface.

General inquiries should be sent to info@celer.network, and technical support is available via the GitHub repository, as well as the Community Forum.

High availability is maintained by Off-chain Service Provider (OSP) nodes relaying payments and clients connect to OSPs to access the state channel network.

cBridge is a decentralized and non-custodial system. State channels have peer-to-peer control of funds, which can be resolved using on-chain mechanisms.

Is Celer Network Worth It?

cBridge has processed $14+B in transfers across 40+ chains using Layer-2 state channel technology developed by Celer Network. The maturity of its infrastructure, along with its active GitHub development and extensive documentation, make it an attractive choice to meet the needs of scaling blockchains. It's best suited for developers who are creating scalable dApps rather than end-users.

Recommended For

  • Developers that need state-channel-based infrastructure for blockchain applications
  • DeFi projects that require cross-chain bridging
  • Development teams that are building multi-chain based payment, gaming, etc. dApps
  • Technical teams that are familiar with managing nodes

!
Use With Caution

  • Project teams that want simple, user-friendly interfaces for their users without the burden of maintaining underlying infrastructure
  • Teams that do not possess the necessary skills and knowledge for developing blockchain applications
  • Projects that require sub-second finality for their use cases

Not Recommended For

  • Users that expect to interact with consumer apps and/or have no experience with blockchain applications
  • Projects that are limited to working within a single chain solution
  • Budget-constrained teams with out the capability for DevOps
Expert's Conclusion

Celer Network is a mature state channel solution that provides enterprise-grade state channel infrastructure for technical teams that are developing cross-chain based applications.

Best For
Developers that need state-channel-based infrastructure for blockchain applicationsDeFi projects that require cross-chain bridgingDevelopment teams that are building multi-chain based payment, gaming, etc. dApps

What do expert reviews and research say about Celer Network?

Key Findings

Celer Network is providing mature state channel-based technology, cBridge has already processed $14+B in transfers across 40+ chains. In addition to this, Celer Network has actively contributed to open source development of goCeler-oss which also includes an Open Source Software (OSP) implementation of cBridge. Additionally, there are community resources available such as the community forum and email, however they are primarily targeted at developers and not consumer oriented.

Data Quality

Good - detailed technical documentation from official sources and active GitHub. Limited consumer-facing information and no public business support tier details.

Risk Factors

!
As Celer Networks has been focused on developing a developer-based product offering, it may limit its mass market appeal.
!
Managing nodes required for Celer Network's state channel solution will require technical expertise from the teams implementing the solution.
!
There is a competitive L2 landscape with alternative rollup solutions.
!
Due to the lack of publicly accessible information regarding Celer Network's business support options, project teams may struggle to find additional assistance.
Last updated: February 2026

What Additional Information Is Available for Celer Network?

Developer Community

Celer Network has an active GitHub repository (goCeler-oss), as well as an extensive documentation set for setting up and operating state-channels. They also offer a community and governance forum for discussing all things related to Celer Network. Beginning of Text:

cBridge Performance

More than $14 billion in processed cross-chain transfer volume and over 540 thousand unique users have used the system that supports more than 40 blockchains and layer 2 rollups built using Celer’s Inter-chain Messaging Framework.

Technical Architecture

The cross-platform messaging is done using Protocol Buffers. Celer supports both CelerPay payment channels and CelerApp general state channels. The OSP (Off-Chain Payment) node enables multi-hop payment routing between parties.

Ecosystem Integration

Listed as a member of the ChainLink ecosystem. Partners are visible in the cBridge integrations throughout the major chains. Active in the DeFi and blockchain scaling communities.

What Are the Best Alternatives to Celer Network?

  • •
    Optimism: An optimistic rollup of Ethereum Layer-2 is a simpler way to deploy than state channels. More suitable for general dApps, less so for payment micropayments. More mature tooling available in the ecosystem. (optimism.io)
  • •
    Arbitrum: A leading Ethereum Layer-2 rollup with significant DeFi adoption. Less complicated for developers than state channel operations, higher security assumptions. Best suited for general smart contract platforms. (arbitrum.io)
  • •
    Polygon zkEVM: A zero-knowledge rollup of Ethereum equivalence. A stronger security model than state channels, but also more complex in terms of validation. Best for high value DeFi use cases. (polygon.technology)
  • •
    Connext: A cross-chain interoperability protocol utilizing state channels. Competitor to cBridge with a different liquidity model, but more focused on xCall messaging framework. (connext.network)
  • •
    LayerZero: An omnichain interoperability protocol connecting 50+ chains. Application-focused messaging versus Celer’s payment channels. Better for complex cross-chain dApps. (layerzero.network)

How Fast and Reliable Is Celer Network?

N/A status
State Channel Performance

What Core Channel Features Does Celer Network Offer?

Two-Party Payment Channels

CelerPay channels enable fast payments between two parties; this can be used as a foundation for client-OSP and OSP-OSP connections.

General State Updates

CelerApp channels allow for arbitrary state transitions for complex dApps such as gaming, DeFi and conditional payments via dependency DAGs.

Multi-Party Channels

The primary implementation utilizes a hub-spoke model with OSPs; multi-party is managed by virtual channels and payment routing instead of direct N-party channels.

Virtual Channels

OSP nodes enable clients to create virtual app channels through OSP intermediaries using existing payment channel infrastructure.

Unilateral Exit

Supported via a dispute timeout process; peers may either resolve their disputes at the end of the dispute timeframe, or they may use the cooperative dispute resolution option

Multi-Asset Transfers

Supports multiple tokens through a single payment channel; all payments to the same token type will go through one CelerPay channel

Conditional State Updates

Generalized State Channels allow for complex dependency and conditionals that are required in many of the advanced DApps

Channel Netting

Distributed Balanced Routing (DBR), provides an effective method of netting and routing payments across the network.

What Is Celer Network's Blockchain Integration Specs?

Base Layer Support
Ethereum (primary), blockchain-agnostic framework
On-Chain Transactions Required
Minimum 2-4 transactions per channel lifecycle
Smart Contract Type
Optimized state channel contracts + multisig
Finality Requirements
Base layer finality + dispute timeout (10000 blocks default)
Supported Token Standards
ERC-20, native ETH, multi-token per channel
Node Implementation
Go/grpC CelerNodes (OSP + Client)

What Is Celer Network's Security And Dispute Resolution Status?

Dispute Timeout Mechanism10000 block default dispute window; enables final settlement confirmation after timeout period; prevents premature unilateral closure
Cryptographic State CommitmentsAll off-chain state updates cryptographically signed with structured protobuf serialization for integrity
Cooperative SettlementIntentSettle + ConfirmSettle flow enables rapid cooperative channel closure without waiting full dispute timeout
Unilateral Close ProtectionForce settle available after dispute timeout; protects against counterparty disappearance via timeout-based finality
Structured Contract UpgradesZero-downtime per-channel upgrades through protobuf compatibility and structured contract design
Off-Chain Message SecuritygRPC streaming with end-to-end encryption between CelerNodes; prevents tampering during state exchange
Channel IsolationPayment channels (CelerPay) and app channels (CelerApp) independently managed; failure isolation

How Does Celer Network's Primary Use Case Matrix Compare?

Use CaseTransaction FrequencyParticipant ModelState Update TypeSuitabilityRationale
AI Agent PaymentsHigh frequency micropaymentsAI agents + OSPsStreaming paymentsOptimalCeler AgentPay enables instant low-cost AI agent payments via state channels (launched Nov 2025)
Turn-Based GamingSeconds to minutes per movePlayers via OSPsGame state + paymentsOptimalCelerApp generalized state channels support gaming with dependency DAGs for complex interactions
Micropayments / StreamingThousands per minuteContent providers + consumersBalance updatesOptimalHigh-frequency payments between known parties; near-zero marginal costs
Decentralized ExchangesOrder matching frequencyTraders through OSP networkOrder book + settlementGoodVirtual channels enable DEX routing; reduces on-chain footprint for high-frequency trading
Cross-Chain TransfersVariableCross-chain participantsInteroperability stateOptimalCeler excels in cross-chain state channel interoperability
Prediction MarketsEvent-drivenMarket participants + OSPsConditional outcomesOptimalGeneralized state channels with dependency DAG support complex conditional logic

What Is Celer Network's Network Topology And Routing?

Hub-and-Spoke (OSP Model)
Off-chain Service Providers (OSPs) form interconnected core with Clients as leaves; all client payments route through OSP
Hub-and-Spoke (OSP Model) - Tradeoffs
Simplified client experience; OSPs require high availability and capital; enables network effects
Distributed Balanced Routing (DBR)
Provably optimal routing solving dynamic topology challenges; handles constantly changing channel states
Distributed Balanced Routing (DBR) - Tradeoffs
Order of magnitude higher throughput vs traditional shortest path; converges rapidly in dynamic networks
Virtual Payment Channels
Client-OSP payment channel enables virtual app channels to any network participant
Virtual Payment Channels - Tradeoffs
Capital efficient; single payment channel handles all traffic; OSP becomes trusted routing path
gRPC P2P Streaming
Persistent grpc streams between OSPs for state messaging and payment routing
gRPC P2P Streaming - Tradeoffs
Low-latency reliable messaging; requires stable connectivity between OSP peers
Peer Registration
OSP-cli registerstream command establishes persistent connections between peers
Peer Registration - Tradeoffs
Simple topology bootstrap; manual initially but enables automated reconnection

Celer Participant Safeguards

Dispute Timeout Finality10000 block dispute window guarantees unilateral settlement protection; counterparty cannot reverse after timeout
Cooperative Settlement PathIntentSettle + ConfirmSettle enables rapid closure without dispute wait; available for Client-OSP channels
Cryptographic State SigningAll state updates require participant signatures; prevents unauthorized modifications
Bounded Capital LockupMaximum lockup duration defined by dispute timeout; funds recoverable post-settlement
OSP Capital RequirementsOSPs maintain sufficient channel reserves; reduces liquidity risk for client connections
Channel Status PersistenceCockroachDB stores complete channel state; enables recovery and forensic analysis

How Does Celer Network's Asset Type Support And Extensibility Compare?

Asset TypeSupport LevelChannel ImplementationLimitations & Notes
Native ETHNativeDirect contract balance managementPrimary settlement asset; fastest processing
ERC-20 TokensNativeMulti-token support per payment channel; token-specific channel routingAll payments of same token through single channel; approve() required pre-deposit
StablecoinsERC StandardTreated as ERC-20; same channel routing logicPopular for payments; standard ERC-20 handling
Cross-Chain AssetsExtensibleFramework supports bridge-wrapped assets; interoperability focusLeverages Celer cross-chain capabilities
AI Agent TokensNativeAgentPay streaming payments (launched 2025)Optimized for high-frequency micropayments

Expert Reviews

📝

No reviews yet

Be the first to review Celer Network!

Write a Review

Similar Products

Perun
perun.network
Raiden Network
raiden.network
Connext
connext.network