/

Polygon zkEVM

  • What it is:Polygon zkEVM is a Layer-2 ZK-Rollup scaling solution for Ethereum that is fully EVM-equivalent, enabling seamless deployment of existing smart contracts using zero-knowledge proofs.
  • Best for:Ethereum developers seeking scalability, DeFi protocols needing low fees + security, Teams building app-chains
  • Pricing:Starting from $0.001 - $0.02
  • Rating:88/100Very Good
  • Expert's conclusion:Polygon zkEVM is the number one choice for Ethereum-native developers who want to scale using ZK scaling without having to migrate any code.
Visit website
Reviewed byMaxim Manylov·Web3 Engineer & Serial Founder

What Is Polygon zkEVM and What Does It Do?

Polygon Labs developed Polygon zkEVM; it is an Ethereum compatible Layer 2 (L2) zero knowledge proof based scalability solution for Ethereum, providing enhanced security through the use of ZK proofs for lower cost transaction processing. Polygon Labs leads the entire Polygon ecosystem that consists of several Layer 2 (L2) scalability solutions including both Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and zkEVM blockchains. In addition to leading the Polygon ecosystem, Polygon Labs will also focus on developing ZK based scalable roll-up networks using the Polygon CDK.

Active
📅Founded 2017
🏢Private
TARGET SEGMENTS
Blockchain DevelopersDeFi ProjectsWeb3 GamingdApp Builders

What Are Polygon zkEVM's Key Business Metrics?

📊
March 2023
Mainnet Launch
📊
ZK Rollup
Type
📊
Full (Type 1 goal)
EVM Compatibility
📊
Dragonfruit, Etrog
Key Upgrades
📊
L2 Scaling Solution
Network Type

How Credible and Trustworthy Is Polygon zkEVM?

88/100
Excellent

The company has built upon its original Ethereum L2 and developed a fully functional ZK system for validating the execution of smart contracts on the Ethereum blockchain. All smart contracts are executed on the L1 (Layer 1) Ethereum blockchain and the company has implemented all necessary updates to the Ethereum protocol to support the development of the Polygon zkEVM.

BREAKDOWN
Product Maturity85/100
Company Stability90/100
Security & Compliance95/100
User Reviews80/100
Transparency90/100
Support Quality85/100
TRUST SIGNALS
First open-source zkEVMEthereum L1 security via ZK proofsEVM equivalent compatibilityPolygon CDK for chain deployment

What is the history of Polygon zkEVM and its key milestones?

2017

Polygon Founded

Polygon Labs was originally launched as Matic Network, the purpose being to develop and deploy various Ethereum scalability solutions.

2021

Rebranded to Polygon

From its early days as a single sidechain scaling solution, Polygon Labs expanded its reach and now serves as a complete ecosystem of L2 solutions for scaling Ethereum.

2023

Polygon zkEVM Mainnet Launch

On March 27, 2023, Polygon Labs successfully deployed the first open-source zkEVM (Zero-Knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine) to the public Ethereum network.

2023

Polygon CDK Launched

Polygon Labs created an open-source Chain Development Kit called the Polygon CDK to help developers create their own ZK rollup-based chains.

2023

AggLayer Announced

The Polygon CDK functions as a unified interoperability layer across all the chains in the Polygon ecosystem.

What Are the Key Features of Polygon zkEVM?

✨
EVM Equivalence
Because the Polygon zkEVM provides full compatibility with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), users can easily migrate existing smart contracts into the Polygon network by simply deploying them onto the Polygon zkEVM without needing to make any modifications to the contract's source code.
🔒
ZK Proof Security
By utilizing ZK validity proofs, the Polygon zkEVM inherits all of the security features available on the Ethereum Layer 1 (L1) blockchain while still batching together numerous transactions for improved scalability compared to traditional blockchain methods.
✨
Low Transaction Costs
Users of the Polygon zkEVM will experience significantly reduced fees due to the use of ZK proofs along with optimizations made to the zkSNARK footprint on the L1 (Layer 1) Ethereum blockchain.
✨
High Performance
With the implementation of the Polygon Zero technology, users will be able to achieve fast finality and utilize recursive STARK proofs to further improve scalability within the Polygon zkEVM.
✨
Developer Tooling
Developers will find that existing Ethereum tools, wallets, and other forms of infrastructure will function seamlessly within the Polygon zkEVM without requiring any modifications.
🔗
Polygon CDK Integration
The Polygon CDK allows developers to create their own custom ZK rollup chain, offering a wide range of modular configuration options.

What Technology Stack and Infrastructure Does Polygon zkEVM Use?

Infrastructure

ZK Rollup architecture with Ethereum L1 data availability

Technologies

SolidityEVM BytecodezkSNARKsPolygon ZeroSTARK Proofs

Integrations

Ethereum L1Polygon PoSPolygon CDK ChainsAggLayerStandard EVM Wallets

Based on official Polygon zkEVM documentation and technical reports

What Are the Best Use Cases for Polygon zkEVM?

High-Value DeFi Applications
The Polygon zkEVM utilizes ZK proofs to provide Ethereum level security for the validation of large transactions where security is a higher priority than the need for maximum transaction speeds.
Ethereum dApp Developers
Since the Polygon zkEVM provides full compatibility with the EVM, developers can easily migrate existing smart contracts to the Polygon zkEVM without requiring any modifications to the contract's source code.
NFT and Gaming Projects
Due to the combination of low fees and high levels of security, the Polygon zkEVM is well-suited for applications such as frequent transactions in gaming economies and the transfer of digital collectibles.
ZK Rollup Chain Builders
Using the Polygon CDK, developers can create custom ZK chains that will have shared security and interoperability via the AggLayer.
NOT FORUltra-High Throughput Gaming
Best option to scale a Polygon PoS or Validium-based project to achieve the most throughput with the least cost; zkevm will always prioritize security over raw throughput.
NOT FORNon-EVM Developers
Requiring an understanding of Solidity/EVM; alternative Layer 2 projects will be better suited for non-Ethereum developers.

How Much Does Polygon zkEVM Cost and What Plans Are Available?

Pricing information with service tiers, costs, and details
☐Service$CostℹDetails🔗Source
Transaction Fees$0.001 - $0.02Low gas fees on zkEVM mainnet, 90-95% cheaper than Ethereum even during congestion—
Network UsagePay-per-use in ETH or native tokensNo subscription tiers; costs scale with transaction volume and complexity—
Custom Chain DeploymentCustom enterprise pricingPolygon CDK for launching permissioned zk-chains; institutional deployments—
Infrastructure ProvidersVaries (QuickNode, Alchemy, Chainstack)RPC/node services with usage-based pricing for developers and apps—
Transaction Fees$0.001 - $0.02
Low gas fees on zkEVM mainnet, 90-95% cheaper than Ethereum even during congestion
Network UsagePay-per-use in ETH or native tokens
No subscription tiers; costs scale with transaction volume and complexity
Custom Chain DeploymentCustom enterprise pricing
Polygon CDK for launching permissioned zk-chains; institutional deployments
Infrastructure ProvidersVaries (QuickNode, Alchemy, Chainstack)
RPC/node services with usage-based pricing for developers and apps

How Does Polygon zkEVM Compare to Competitors?

FeaturePolygon zkEVMArbitrumOptimismzkSync
Core Functionalityzk-Rollup (ZK Proofs)Optimistic RollupOptimistic Rollupzk-Rollup
Ethereum CompatibilityFull EVM EquivalenceFull EVMFull EVMFull EVM
Avg Transaction Fee$0.001-$0.02$0.10-$0.30$0.15-$0.40$0.001-$0.01
Finality Time2-3 seconds1-7 days (challenge)1-7 days (challenge)Seconds
Monthly Transactions~200M (ecosystem)~150M~120M~100M+
Multi-Solution EcosystemYes (PoS + zkEVM + CDK)NoNoPartial
AggLayer InteroperabilityYesNoNoNo
Enterprise CDKYes (permissioned chains)NoNoPartial
Developer ActivityHighHighMedium-HighHigh
TVL (ecosystem)$1.2B+$10B+$5B+$2B+
Core Functionality
Polygon zkEVMzk-Rollup (ZK Proofs)
ArbitrumOptimistic Rollup
OptimismOptimistic Rollup
zkSynczk-Rollup
Ethereum Compatibility
Polygon zkEVMFull EVM Equivalence
ArbitrumFull EVM
OptimismFull EVM
zkSyncFull EVM
Avg Transaction Fee
Polygon zkEVM$0.001-$0.02
Arbitrum$0.10-$0.30
Optimism$0.15-$0.40
zkSync$0.001-$0.01
Finality Time
Polygon zkEVM2-3 seconds
Arbitrum1-7 days (challenge)
Optimism1-7 days (challenge)
zkSyncSeconds
Monthly Transactions
Polygon zkEVM~200M (ecosystem)
Arbitrum~150M
Optimism~120M
zkSync~100M+
Multi-Solution Ecosystem
Polygon zkEVMYes (PoS + zkEVM + CDK)
ArbitrumNo
OptimismNo
zkSyncPartial
AggLayer Interoperability
Polygon zkEVMYes
ArbitrumNo
OptimismNo
zkSyncNo
Enterprise CDK
Polygon zkEVMYes (permissioned chains)
ArbitrumNo
OptimismNo
zkSyncPartial
Developer Activity
Polygon zkEVMHigh
ArbitrumHigh
OptimismMedium-High
zkSyncHigh
TVL (ecosystem)
Polygon zkEVM$1.2B+
Arbitrum$10B+
Optimism$5B+
zkSync$2B+

How Does Polygon zkEVM Compare to Competitors?

vs Arbitrum

The use of zk proofs on Polygon zkevm to provide greater security assurances than Arbitrum’s optimistic roll-up approach. Polygon is offering a variety of scaling options (PoS + zkEVM + CDK) whereas Arbitrum is focusing primarily on optimistic roll-ups. Fees are consistently lower on Polygon ($0.015 average) compared to Arbitrum ($0.10 – $0.30 average).

zkevm for applications requiring the highest level of security and/or those who wish to utilize a multi-chain strategy; Arbitrum for achieving the highest TVL / DeFi dominance.

vs Optimism

The zk-rollup offered by Polygon has the added benefit of providing a cryptographic validation versus Optimism’s fraud proof method. Polygon’s ecosystem handles a significantly larger volume of transactions per month (approximately 200 million) with faster finality (2 – 3 seconds). Additionally, the flexibility that Polygon offers as a multi-solution platform separates it from Optimism’s singular tech focus.

Polygon for developers who require zk security and/or need to create customized chains; Optimism for enthusiasts utilizing the OP Stack.

vs zkSync Era

While both are pure zk-rollups with similarly low fees ($0.001 range), Polygon also includes additional functionality through its integration into the broader AggLayer ecosystem along with CDK for creating custom chains. zkSync currently leads in terms of native account abstraction; however, Polygon excels in terms of Ethereum tool compatibility.

zkevm for teams whose primary development stack is based on EVM; zkSync for developers who want native ZK features and account abstraction.

vs Starknet

Polygon zkevm utilizes EVM as opposed to Starknet which uses the Cairo language (a learning curve). Polygon allows for full equivalence to the Ethereum network and makes migrating easier. Starknet offers potentially higher theoretical throughput but requires the developer to adapt their programming language.

zkevm for Ethereum developers requiring EVM first compatibility; Starknet for developing optimized custom VMs.

What are the strengths and limitations of Polygon zkEVM?

Pros

  • EVM-compatible environment — Full EVM compatibility with zero required code modifications
  • Extremely Low Transaction Fees — As little as $0.001-$0.02 for each transaction regardless of network congestion (typically 90-95% less expensive than the base layer)
  • Variety of Scaling Options Available — PoS, zkEVM, CDK & future AggLayer
  • Very High Throughput — Approximately 200 Million Monthly Transactions Across Ecosystem I am going to make the provided information below from the marker “BEGIN_TEXT” to “END_TEXT”, in a way that makes it sound like you wrote it yourself, as long as the information remains the same and does not alter any of the dates, facts, etc. I will simply paraphrase the information and provide it back to you, so do not worry about me answering the questions at all. I am simply here to assist you by providing the paraphrased version of the text! Do not ask me anything else! I’m ready to assist you! BEGIN_TEXT
  • Chain Development Kit — allows developers to create their own zk-powered chains
  • AggLayer interoperability — unifies liquidity on multiple Polygon chains
  • Mainnet — has been operating under production conditions since its beta launch
  • Enterprise-ready — can be deployed within an institutionally governed permissioned environment

Cons

  • Younger Ecosystem — compared to Arbitrum/Optimism’s $5-$10 billion in total value locked ($TVL), our ecosystem has approximately $1.2 billion in $TVL.
  • zk-proof generation time — produces proof slightly slower than optimistic rollups
  • Complex multi-chain strategy — The PoS/zkEVM/AggLayer strategy may cause confusion and decision paralysis for developers.
  • Uncertainty regarding tokenomics — The MATIC to POL migration and inflationary concerns are creating uncertainty among investors.
  • Competition Intensity — While Arbitrum has a greater amount of TVL, Optimism appears to have a larger share of developer mind-share.
  • Delays In Bridge Times — The typical L2 deposit/withdrawal time ranges from a few minutes to several hours.
  • High learning Curve For CDK — Creating a custom zk-chain through the Polygon CDK will require significant experience with blockchain development.

Who Is Polygon zkEVM Best For?

Best For

  • Ethereum developers seeking scalability — Full EVM Equivalence — The ability to immediately migrate to a zkEVM network without changing your contract code.
  • DeFi protocols needing low fees + security — Perfect for High-Volume Trading/Lending With zk-Proofs and $0.001 Fees — zkEVM networks are ideal for high volume trading/lending use cases due to low costs and fast transaction speeds.
  • Teams building app-chains — Enables Custom zk-Chains Using Shared Security and Liquidity — The Polygon CDK allows developers to build custom zk-chains utilizing the shared security and liquidity of the Polygon ecosystem.
  • Enterprise blockchain initiatives — Provides Permissioned zkEVM Chains with AggLayer Interoperability for Institutions — The Polygon CDK provides institutions with permissioned zkEVM chains with AggLayer interoperability.
  • Multi-chain strategies — Unifies Liquidity Across PoS, zkEVM, and Future Rollups Using AggLayer — AggLayer provides the capability to unify liquidity across different types of blockchains including PoS, zkEVM, and future rollups.

Not Suitable For

  • Rust/Solidity alternatives developers — Consider Solana, Aptos, or Sui if you want native support for other performance-oriented programming languages — If you need to run code that uses native support for performance-oriented programming languages, you should look into running your smart contracts on Solana, Aptos, or Sui instead of a EVM-only zkEVM.
  • Highest TVL DeFi projects — Migrate Your Contracts To Arbitrum/OP For Access To The Deepest Pools Of Liquidity — If you need access to the largest amounts of liquidity available today, you should migrate your smart contracts to either Arbitrum or Optimism.
  • Sub-second finality applications — zk-Proof Generation Time Adds Latency Compared To Solana or Purpose-Built High TPS Networks — zk-proof generation adds latency when compared to other high-performance networks such as Solana or those designed specifically for high transaction-per-second (TPS) processing.
  • Single-protocol focus teams — Complexity Created by Polygon’s Multi-Solution Strategy Confusing Developers Compared to Optimism’s Pure OP Stack — The complex nature of Polygon’s multi-solution strategy is causing confusion and frustration among developers when compared to the pure, simple nature of Optimism’s OP Stack.

Are There Usage Limits or Geographic Restrictions for Polygon zkEVM?

Transaction Fees
$0.001-$0.02 (rarely exceeds $0.02)
Finality Time
2-3 seconds (zk-proof settlement)
Bridging Time
Few minutes deposit / 7-day challenge window withdrawal
EVM Compatibility
Full Ethereum bytecode support
Custom Chain Deployment
Requires Polygon CDK expertise
AggLayer Maturity
Mid-2026 rollout for full interoperability
Token Economics
MATIC/POL migration impacts
Geographic Availability
Global (crypto standard restrictions)

Is Polygon zkEVM Secure and Compliant?

ZK Validity ProofsCryptographic proofs guarantee transaction validity — no fraud possible
Ethereum L1 SecurityInherited Ethereum consensus and economic security guarantees
Mainnet Beta ProvenProduction operational with real economic value secured
Shared Sequencer ResearchAggLayer roadmap eliminates centralization risks
Permissioned ChainsEnterprise CDK enables privacy-preserving deployments
Multi-Region InfrastructureDecentralized validators and redundancy across providers
Polygon Labs AuditsMultiple independent security audits published

What Customer Support Options Does Polygon zkEVM Offer?

Channels
For technical support and bug reports via 0xPolygonHermez repositoriesCommunity support through Polygon Discord channelsSelf-service via official docs.polygon.technology/zkevmContact form on polygon.technology for general inquiries
Hours
Community support available 24/7, official responses during business hours
Response Time
Community: variable; Official GitHub/email: 1-5 business days typical
Satisfaction
No public G2/Capterra ratings; positive developer feedback on GitHub
Specialized
Technical support for zkEVM node operators via documentation and Discord
Business Tier
Custom enterprise support available through Polygon Labs partnerships
Support Limitations
•No dedicated 24/7 live support; primarily community-driven
•Enterprise-level support requires custom partnership
•No phone support available

What APIs and Integrations Does Polygon zkEVM Support?

API Type
JSON-RPC API fully compatible with Ethereum EVM standards
Authentication
No authentication required for public RPC; private nodes use standard Ethereum RPC access
Webhooks
Not natively supported; use event logs and indexing services like The Graph or Dune Analytics
SDKs
ethers.js, web3.js, viem; all standard Ethereum libraries work seamlessly due to EVM equivalence
Documentation
Comprehensive at docs.polygon.technology/zkevm; includes RPC endpoints, node setup, and developer guides
Sandbox
Public testnets available for testing; mainnet beta for production-like environment
SLA
Sequencer operated by Polygon Labs with high availability; inherits Ethereum L1 security guarantees
Rate Limits
Public RPC: rate limited; recommended to run own node or use paid providers like Alchemy/Infura
Use Cases
dApp deployment, wallet integration, DeFi protocols, NFT marketplaces; full Ethereum toolchain compatibility

What Are Common Questions About Polygon zkEVM?

Polygon zkEVM is an Ethereum Layer 2 Scaling Solution That Uses Zero-Knowledge Proofs to Provide High Throughput and Low Costs, While Maintaining Full EVM Equivalence. It Allows Existing Ethereum Smart Contracts, Tools and Wallets to Work Seamlessly Without Any Code Changes.

Polygon PoS utilizes Proof-of-Stake Checkpoints whereas zkEVM employs Cryptographic ZK Proofs to prove Validity (thus offering Stronger Security Guarantees) and Ethereum Equivalence Execution. zkEVM is capable of producing Faster Finality and Better Scalability for Complex dApps.

Yes, it achieves EVM Equivalence which means that almost all of the Ethereum OpCodes, Smart Contracts, and Developer Tools will Work Without Modification. The Architecture Recreates EVM Behavior Using zkSNARKs for Proof Generation.

Yes, it Inherently Inherit's Ethereum L1 Security Through Validity Proofs Submitted to Ethereum. Transactions Are Batched and Cryptographically Proven Correct; there is No Trusted Sequencer Risk as a result of Forced Error Detection Mechanisms.

Due to ZK Batching and Optimized Proofs, transactions Cost a Fraction of what Ethereum L1 Costs. Gas Fees Are Paid in ETH and Remain Very Low, thus making it suitable for High-Volume dApps and Everyday Usage.

Yes, Nodes Can Run in Sequencer, Aggregator or RPC Modes. Minimum Requirements Are 32 GB Ram / 8 Core Cpu, Recommended 64 GB Ram / 16 Core with 2.5 TB + SSD Storage.

Near Instant Finality through a Trusted Sequencer with Full L1 Settlement via ZK Proofs Every Few Minutes. It Achieves 1000 X Ethereum Throughput with Sub Second User Experience.

Comprehensive Documentation, Active GitHub Repositories, and Discord Community Provide Support. For Production Deployments Consider Partnering or Running Dedicated Nodes.

Is Polygon zkEVM Worth It?

Polygon zkEVM Delivers Industry Leading EVM Equivalence With ZK Rollup Security, thereby Allowing Seamless Ethereum dApp Migration At 1000X Scale And Near Zero Cost. Fully MainNet Operational With Proven Architecture Using Recursive STARK Proofs and zkSNARK Compression. Best-In-Class For Developers Prioritizing Ethereum Compatibility Without Compromising On Scalability Or Security.

Recommended For

  • Ethereum Developers Building High-Throughput DeFi, Gaming Or NFT dApps
  • Projects Requiring Full EVM Tool Chain Compatibility On L2
  • Teams Prioritizing Cryptographic Security Over Optimistic Rollups
  • dApps that require Ethereum-grade finality at a low cost to users

!
Use With Caution

  • Projects that require sub-minutes L1 settlement — as the use of sequencers will be phased-out
  • Resource constrained developers — Running provers requires an amount of hardware
  • Very complex opcodes may require bytecode changes for complete equivalence

Not Recommended For

  • Non-EVM projects that have their own custom VMs
  • Apps that are cost sensitive and every fee on L2 matters — Consider Polygon PoS
  • Teams that cannot manage the complexity of the ZK prover infrastructure
Expert's Conclusion

Polygon zkEVM is the number one choice for Ethereum-native developers who want to scale using ZK scaling without having to migrate any code.

Best For
Ethereum Developers Building High-Throughput DeFi, Gaming Or NFT dAppsProjects Requiring Full EVM Tool Chain Compatibility On L2Teams Prioritizing Cryptographic Security Over Optimistic Rollups

What do expert reviews and research say about Polygon zkEVM?

Key Findings

Polygon zkEVM uses zkSNARK proofs with recursive STARK aggregation to achieve complete EVM equivalence and can deliver up to 1000 times the scalability of Ethereum while maintaining all of its L1 security. The polygon zkEVM has been operating in Beta mode on Mainnet since 2023 and will utilize the Trusteed Sequencer Architecture which will eventually become decentralized. Polygon provides comprehensive tooling to help developers maintain compatibility throughout the entire Ethereum ecosystem.

Data Quality

Excellent - detailed technical documentation from official sources, GitHub repositories, and third-party audits. Architecture thoroughly documented with node specifications and proof systems. Limited commercial metrics as protocol rather than SaaS product.

Risk Factors

!
Trusted Sequencer centralization (Roadmap for Decentralization currently active)
!
High hardware requirements for prover/aggregator nodes
!
Edge cases for very complex contracts that could have EVM equivalence issues
!
Competitive ZK L2 Landscape with Rapid Innovation
Last updated: January 2026

What Additional Information Is Available for Polygon zkEVM?

Architecture Components

Trusted Sequencer for Transaction Ordering Trustee Aggregator for Generation of ZK Proof Consensus Contract on Ethereum L1. The zkProver Engine performs Polynomial Computations across Sequencer, Aggregator and RPC Node Modes.

Developer Ecosystem

Full Support of Ethereum Tool Chain Including Foundry, HardHat, Ethers.js. Extensive Documentation covering the Operation of Nodes, RPC Endpoints and Recursion of Proofs. An active GitHub repository zkevm-techdocs.

AggLayer Integration

Part of Polygon's AggLayer Ecosystem Enabling Unified Liquidity Across ZK Chains. A Custom Development Kit (CDK) is available to enable Developers to build their own ZK L2s utilizing zkEVM Technology.

Technical Roadmap

Etrog Upgrade Now Live on MainNet. Introduces Type 1 Prover to Upgrade EVM Chained to ZK. Ongoing process of Decentralizing the Sequencer Network.

Hardware Requirements

A node in a blockchain network is going to need at least 32 GB of RAM and an 8 core CPU; it is suggested that you have at least 64 GB of RAM and a 16 core CPU along with 2.5 TB of SSD. Proving operations are extremely taxing on resources.

What Are the Best Alternatives to Polygon zkEVM?

  • •
    zkSync Era: Matter Labs' ZK L2 has native account abstraction and EVM compatibility. The company has placed emphasis on making the user experience better through the use of paymasters and session management. This solution will be best suited for consumer dApps who want a great user experience but do not necessarily care about having a completely compatible EVM implementation. (zksync.io)
  • •
    Starknet: Cairo VM based ZK L2 with STARK proofs, this solution offers extreme scalability. However, users will require a lot of time and effort to learn a new programming language. If your project needs the absolute highest amount of performance then this solution may be right for you. (starknet.io)
  • •
    Linea: Consensys built zkEVM which has the ability to provide EVM equivalence, while also providing enterprise level support. They also have an aggressive grant program for their customers. If you are currently using Ethereum and would like to transition to a zkEVM, or if you are looking for a provider with enterprise backing, then Consensys may be the right choice for you. (linea.build)
  • •
    Scroll: Bytecode-level EVM equivalent zk-rollup, with an audited proof system. They have had multiple third party audits performed to ensure the security of their platform. This solution will be ideal for DeFi protocols that have high levels of security requirements. (scroll.io)
  • •
    Polygon PoS: There is no other L2 solution as mature as Polygon's L2, they have a massive ecosystem and almost zero fees. Their optimistic rollup solution uses 2 min checkpoints instead of ZK validation proofs. If you are a developer that wants to build a low-cost application, and you can accept a slightly weaker security model than what other solutions offer, then Polygon may be the right choice for you. (polygon.technology/pos)
  • •
    Taiko: Taiko offers a decentralized zkEVM that is aligned with Ethereum, while placing an emphasis on the use of permissionless provers. From day one Taiko used a sequencer. If you are a developer that places a priority on decentralization above all else, and does not require the fastest possible performance in the short term, then Taiko may be the right choice for you. (taiko.xyz)

What Are Polygon zkEVM's Zk Network Metrics?

96M+
Total Transactions
8.4M (Polygon avg)
Daily Transactions
100K TPS (roadmap)
Peak TPS
600K+
Active Addresses (Daily)
1.5M+
Total Unique Addresses
$1.36B (ecosystem)
Total Value Locked (TVL)

What Is Polygon zkEVM's Gas Fee Structure?

Average Transaction Fee
$0.015
Simple Transfer
~$0.001
DeFi Swap
~$0.02
Savings vs Mainnet
7X-99% cheaper
Fee Model
L2 execution + zkSNARK proof
Gas Efficiency Improvement
28% (next upgrade)

What Is Polygon zkEVM's Zk Proof Technology?

Proof System
zkSNARKs + Polygon Zero
Trusted Setup
Required
Quantum Resistance
Limited
Proof Generation Time
<1 minute
Finality Time
Fast with frequent proofs
Data Availability
On-chain (Ethereum L1)

Which EVM Chains Does Polygon zkEVM Support?

EVM Bytecode SupportFull EVM Equivalence
Solidity CompatibilityNative Support
Vyper SupportSupported
Existing Contract MigrationZero code changes
Custom VMzkEVM
Opcode DifferencesEthereum compatible

What Is Polygon zkEVM's Bridge Infrastructure?

Native Bridge
Official Ethereum L1-L2 bridge
Deposit Time
~10-30 minutes
Withdrawal Time
1-7 days (proof finality)
Supported Assets
ETH, USDC, USDT, ERC-20 tokens
Net Value Bridged
$8.5M+
Security Model
ZK proofs on Ethereum L1

What Are Polygon zkEVM's Ecosystem Defi?

72+ (Q1 2025)
Total dApps
72
New Projects (Q1 2025)
$580M (Jan 2025)
DeFi TVL Inflows
1,000+
Contracts Deployed
400K+
Unique Active Wallets

What Is Polygon zkEVM's Token Governance?

Native Token
POL (formerly MATIC)
Token Type
Gas + Governance + Staking
Total Supply
10B
Governance Model
Polygon DAO
Staking
Available (140K+ validators)
Fee Token
POL across PoS/zkEVM/CDK

What Is Polygon zkEVM's Decentralization Status Status?

Sequencer StatusOperational
Sequencer TypeCentralized (decentralization roadmap)
Prover NetworkType 1 Prover live
Force TransactionAvailable via L1
Transaction Success Rate99.2%+
L2BEAT StageStage 1

Expert Reviews

📝

No reviews yet

Be the first to review Polygon zkEVM!

Write a Review

Similar Products

zkSync Era
zksync.io
Linea
linea.build
Scroll
scroll.io