/

CyberConnect

  • What it is:CyberConnect is a decentralized social graph protocol (cyberconnect.me) enabling self-sovereign, interoperable Web3 social experiences via CyberAccount, CyberGraph, and Cyber L2.
  • Best for:Web3 social app developers, Cross-chain dApp builders, Communities needing status signaling
  • Pricing:Starting from Gas fees on Ethereum
  • Rating:78/100Good
  • Expert's conclusion:Web3-native social app developers who prioritize their users' ability to own their data and enable cross-chain interoperability in preference to web2’s simplicity, will be best served by CyberConnect.
Visit website
Reviewed byMaxim Manylov·Web3 Engineer & Serial Founder

What Is CyberConnect and What Does It Do?

CyberConnect is a Web3 social network protocol that allows users to control ownership of their digital identity, content, relationships and monetization channels. CyberConnect is an open-source technology that can be used by developers to create Web3 social apps with many different types of functionality, including CyberProfile, CyberGraph, and CyberWallet. There are currently over 50 projects utilizing CyberConnect, and there have been over 10 million transactions processed on the CyberConnect Network across multiple blockchain networks.

Active
📅Founded 2021
🏢Private
TARGET SEGMENTS
Web3 DevelopersNFT CommunitiesDecentralized Social AppsContent Creators

What Are CyberConnect's Key Business Metrics?

📊
887k
Profiles
📊
327k
Active Wallets
🔄
7.3M+
Transactions
📊
50+
Ecosystem Projects
📊
1,900+
Organizations
👥
940k active
Flagship App Users (Link3)

How Credible and Trustworthy Is CyberConnect?

78/100
Good

Leading decentralized social networking protocol in Web3 space with strong adoption numbers and multi-chain support, but lacks transparency in terms of company operations and team member details.

BREAKDOWN
Product Maturity85/100
Company Stability75/100
Security & Compliance80/100
User Reviews70/100
Transparency65/100
Support Quality75/100
TRUST SIGNALS
887k profiles created50+ ecosystem projectsMulti-chain deployment (Ethereum, BNB, Polygon)7.3M+ on-chain transactions

What is the history of CyberConnect and its key milestones?

2021

CyberConnect V1 Launched

Launches decentralized social graph protocol on Ethereum Mainnet during Q3 2021 to solve cold start issues for developers of social applications.

2022

CyberConnect V2 Released

Launched Version 2 of CyberConnect in August 2022 with hybrid EVM+Arweave scaling capabilities and multi-chain support (BNB Chain and Polygon) and additional monetization through EssenceNFT/SubscribeNFT.

2023

V3 and CyberWallet Launch

Launched Version 3 of CyberConnect with ERC-4337 account abstraction and CyberWallet mobile app, and plans for Cyber L2 Ethereum Layer 2.

2024

Cyber L2 Mainnet Planned

Roadmap calls for Cyber L2 mainnet deployment, Cyber Staking, and at least 120+ ecosystem dApps, with a goal of 3M+ CyberAccount owners.

What Are the Key Features of CyberConnect?

✨
CyberProfile
ERC-721 NFT as standardized decentralized identity allowing for portability of Web3 identity across various applications.
✨
CyberGraph
Provides a social graph protocol for linking identities, content, and connections across EVM chains using customizable middleware.
💰
CyberWallet
Uses ERC-4337 smart contracts to enable a seamless multi-chain onboarding process and gas abstraction with CyberWallet.
✨
EssenceNFT & SubscribeNFT
Enabling tokenized content collectibles and subscription models for creators to monetize their content.
💬
Multi-Chain Support
Currently deployed on Ethereum, BNB Chain, and Polygon, with plans for Optimism, and Arbitrum deployments via Cyber L2.
✨
CyberAccount
Enables a privacy-first identity system based upon DID (Decentralized Identifier) documents for username, bio, avatar, and social connections.

What Technology Stack and Infrastructure Does CyberConnect Use?

Infrastructure

Ethereum Layer 2 (Cyber L2) with hybrid EVM+off-chain storage

Technologies

SolidityERC-721ERC-4337Arweave

Integrations

EthereumBNB ChainPolygonOptimismArbitrum

AI/ML Capabilities

No specific AI/ML components; focuses on social graph primitives and account abstraction

Based on protocol documentation from CoinMarketCap, Binance Academy, and Coinlaunch analyses

What Are the Best Use Cases for CyberConnect?

Web3 Social App Developers
Can leverage a shared social graph infrastructure to eliminate cold start issues for social apps and facilitate network effects among the over 887k+ existing user profiles.
NFT Community Builders
Enables the creation of portable digital identities and social connections that are persistent across dApps and marketplaces.
Content Creators
The NFTs will be used to monetize with the EssenceNFT and SubscribeNFT subscriptions which will give a user true ownership of their audience connections.
DeFi Protocols Needing Social Data
There is access to rich social graph data such as connections, content, and credential networks that can create unique and personalized experiences for a user.
NOT FORTraditional Web2 Social Platforms
This would be completely inappropriate for this reason – it would require the entire platform to be decentralized and utilize an on-chain identity model that would allow for no control over the data being stored in a centralized manner.
NOT FORHigh-Frequency Trading Bots
This does not apply – the social graph protocol was created specifically for enabling identity/connections as opposed to real time market data.

How Much Does CyberConnect Cost and What Plans Are Available?

Pricing information with service tiers, costs, and details
☐Service$CostℹDetails🔗Source
Profile MintingGas fees on EthereumCurrently only through Link3 on Ethereum mainnet; free on testnetOfficial documentation
CyberAccount SetupGasless (sponsored via bundlers)ERC-4337 compatible with Paymaster solutions for seamless onboardingCyberConnect V3 announcement
Content Creation & NFT MintingNetwork gas feesEssenceNFT for posts, SubscribeNFT for follows/subscriptions; optimized ERC-1155 for W3STProtocol documentation
Cross-Chain OperationsSingle token gas paymentUnified gas payment across multiple chains via account abstraction—
Profile MintingGas fees on Ethereum
Currently only through Link3 on Ethereum mainnet; free on testnet
Official documentation
CyberAccount SetupGasless (sponsored via bundlers)
ERC-4337 compatible with Paymaster solutions for seamless onboarding
CyberConnect V3 announcement
Content Creation & NFT MintingNetwork gas fees
EssenceNFT for posts, SubscribeNFT for follows/subscriptions; optimized ERC-1155 for W3ST
Protocol documentation
Cross-Chain OperationsSingle token gas payment
Unified gas payment across multiple chains via account abstraction

How Does CyberConnect Compare to Competitors?

FeatureCyberConnectFarcasterLens ProtocolPhaver
Core FunctionalityOn-chain social graph + identityOn-chain messaging + framesNFT-based profiles + contentCyberConnect-powered social app
Multi-Chain SupportYes (EVM + L2 planned)Ethereum onlyPolygon onlyMulti-chain via CyberConnect
Account AbstractionERC-4337 (CyberAccount)NoNoUses CyberConnect AA
Gasless OnboardingYes (email/social login)NoNoYes via CyberConnect
Monetization ToolsEssenceNFT + SubscribeNFTFrames + tipsCollect modulesNFT subscriptions
Social RecoveryYes (via ZeroDev)NoNoYes via CyberConnect
Cross-App PortabilityYes (universal social graph)LimitedLimitedHigh via CyberConnect
Status Tokens (W3ST)Yes (ERC-1155)NoNoYes
Developer MiddlewareYes (full protocol)Client-basedModule-basedApp layer
PricingProtocol gas feesProtocol gas feesProtocol gas feesApp-specific
Core Functionality
CyberConnectOn-chain social graph + identity
FarcasterOn-chain messaging + frames
Lens ProtocolNFT-based profiles + content
PhaverCyberConnect-powered social app
Multi-Chain Support
CyberConnectYes (EVM + L2 planned)
FarcasterEthereum only
Lens ProtocolPolygon only
PhaverMulti-chain via CyberConnect
Account Abstraction
CyberConnectERC-4337 (CyberAccount)
FarcasterNo
Lens ProtocolNo
PhaverUses CyberConnect AA
Gasless Onboarding
CyberConnectYes (email/social login)
FarcasterNo
Lens ProtocolNo
PhaverYes via CyberConnect
Monetization Tools
CyberConnectEssenceNFT + SubscribeNFT
FarcasterFrames + tips
Lens ProtocolCollect modules
PhaverNFT subscriptions
Social Recovery
CyberConnectYes (via ZeroDev)
FarcasterNo
Lens ProtocolNo
PhaverYes via CyberConnect
Cross-App Portability
CyberConnectYes (universal social graph)
FarcasterLimited
Lens ProtocolLimited
PhaverHigh via CyberConnect
Status Tokens (W3ST)
CyberConnectYes (ERC-1155)
FarcasterNo
Lens ProtocolNo
PhaverYes
Developer Middleware
CyberConnectYes (full protocol)
FarcasterClient-based
Lens ProtocolModule-based
PhaverApp layer
Pricing
CyberConnectProtocol gas fees
FarcasterProtocol gas fees
Lens ProtocolProtocol gas fees
PhaverApp-specific

How Does CyberConnect Compare to Competitors?

vs Farcaster

While both provide on-chain social capabilities, CyberConnect provides the most comprehensive social middleware with account abstraction compared to Farcaster’s messaging-first protocol. CyberConnect solves the problem of identity fragmentation across multiple blockchains whereas Farcaster focuses solely on providing a short messaging capability native to the Ethereum blockchain.

CyberConnect should be used for building a full social app infrastructure and Farcaster should be used for building a lightweight social broadcasting capability.

vs Lens Protocol

Both provide on-chain social capabilities however, CyberConnect allows for seamless multi-chain identity through its CyberAccount while Lens is specific to the Polygon blockchain. Additionally, CyberConnect provides a wider variety of monetization primitives (W3ST, subscriptions) than Lens.

CyberConnect is the best choice if you want to build a social app that spans multiple blockchains, while Lens is the best choice if you want to go deep into the Polygon ecosystem.

vs Phaver

Phaver uses CyberConnect protocol as the frontend application. CyberConnect is the backbone of the protocol while Phaver provides the polished UI/UX experience. They are complementary and not competing products.

Use CyberConnect to build applications similar to Phaver.

vs Friend.tech

CyberConnect provides the social primitives that extend beyond the keys-based social tokens provided by Friend.tech. CyberConnect allows for true data ownership of the user’s social graph while Friend.tech allows users to have tokenized access to their social graph.

CyberConnect is the best choice for building a complete social infrastructure while Friend.tech is the best choice for experimenting with social tokens.

What are the strengths and limitations of CyberConnect?

Pros

  • Users will have true data ownership of their social graphs and the ability to take those graphs with them from one app to another.
  • With CyberConnect, there will be a single CyberAccount that will work across all of the EVM compatible blockchains using the ERC-4337 standard.
  • There will be gasless onboarding for new users through the use of social logins or email logins without requiring the user to enter a seed phrase through the use of ZeroDev.
  • There will be a wide variety of monetization options available to users through the use of EssenceNFTs, SubscribeNFTs and W3ST status tokens.
  • Developer friendly -- complete middleware for developing social dApps
  • Cross-app interoperability -- ability to connect/share content between applications
  • Optimized contracts -- ERC-1155 W3ST is more gas-efficient than using multiple ERC-721s

Cons

  • Users are still paying gas costs -- network fees will be incurred with multichain operations
  • Early-stage protocol -- version 3 was recently launched; limited battle testing in production
  • Dependent upon Ethereum -- primary minting of tokens still occurs on the Ethereum mainnet
  • Complex for new developers -- requires knowledge of middleware architecture and AA (application abstraction)
  • Limited number of UI front-end applications -- still building UIs that extend beyond Link3/Phaver
  • No Layer 2 yet -- CyberNetwork scalability improvements are pending launch
  • Identity lock-in risk -- once created, CyberProfiles cannot have their core identity changed

Who Is CyberConnect Best For?

Best For

  • Web3 social app developers — Complete middleware stack for identity, graph, and monetization primitives
  • Cross-chain dApp builders — Unified identity resolves the problem of user experience related to switching chains
  • Communities needing status signaling — W3ST allows on-chain verifiable loyalty badges
  • Creators wanting subscription models — SubscribeNFT enables native paid follow/gated content
  • Projects avoiding wallet complexity — Gasless social/email onboarding -- lowers user friction

Not Suitable For

  • Budget-conscious developers — Ethereum gas fees can be substantial when minting on the mainnet. Testnets are recommended before mainnet minting.
  • Single-chain projects — Overkill compared to native chain solutions such as pure Polygon applications.
  • Simple social features only — A Twitter clone does not need the full protocol. Basic smart contracts will do.
  • Non-EVM developers — EVM-only at present. Solana developers should utilize native tools.

Are There Usage Limits or Geographic Restrictions for CyberConnect?

Profile Minting
Ethereum mainnet only (testnet free)
Chain Support
EVM chains (Ethereum, BNB, Polygon); L2 pending
CyberID Transferability
Non-transferable after creation
Gas Sponsorship
Bundler/Paymaster sponsored; rate limits apply
Account Recovery
Social recovery via ZeroDev; not self-managed
Profile Ownership
One EOA per profile; multiple profiles allowed
W3ST Issuance
Organization-controlled; non-transferable ERC-1155
Cross-Chain Identity
Unified via CyberAccount bundling

Is CyberConnect Secure and Compliant?

Self-Sovereign IdentityUsers retain complete control over social graph data and connections
ERC-4337 Account AbstractionIndustry standard smart account security with bundler protection
Cryptographic Key ManagementMultiple key pairs per CyberAccount with clear wallet separation
On-Chain Data Immutability
Non-Transferable ProfilesCyberProfile prevents identity sale/theft; data stays with creator
Decentralized Governance PlannedProtocol upgrades controlled by CYBER token holders
Social RecoveryZeroDev integration prevents permanent key loss

What Customer Support Options Does CyberConnect Offer?

Channels
Community support via official Discord serverSelf-service docs.cyberconnect.meAnnouncements and community queries @CyberConnectHQ
Hours
Community support 24/7, no official hours
Response Time
Community-dependent; no SLAs published
Satisfaction
Not available - no G2/Capterra ratings found
Support Limitations
•No official live chat, phone, or email support channels identified
•Support primarily community-driven, no guaranteed response times
•Enterprise or dedicated support not publicly detailed

What APIs and Integrations Does CyberConnect Support?

API Type
Smart contract-based protocol (ERC-721, ERC-1155, ERC-4337); no traditional REST/GraphQL API
Authentication
Wallet-based (EOA, ERC-4337 account abstraction via ZeroDev); cryptographic key pairs
Webhooks
Not supported; on-chain event listening via blockchain explorers or indexers
SDKs
Developer tools via docs.cyberconnect.me; integration with EVM chains (Ethereum, Polygon, BNB)
Documentation
Comprehensive protocol docs at docs.cyberconnect.me covering CyberAccount, CyberGraph, NFTs
Sandbox
Testnet available for profile minting (free); mainnet minting via Link3 on Ethereum
SLA
Blockchain-dependent; no protocol-level uptime guarantees
Rate Limits
Gas/network limits per chain; no protocol-specific rate limits
Use Cases
Building web3 social apps, portable identities, NFT-based content/subscriptions, cross-chain social graphs

What Are Common Questions About CyberConnect?

CyberConnect is a Web3 social protocol that enables developers to build social applications utilizing user owned identities, content, and connections. CyberConnect utilizes CyberAccount for the creation of portable digital identities and CyberGraph for decentralized storage of social data.

CyberAccount is an ERC-4337 compatible suite of smart contracts utilized for creating self-sovereign Web3 identities. Users receive unique handles similar to "username.cyber" and also receive features including social recovery, email/social login, and unified gas payments across chains.

Supports Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, with V3 introducing multi-chain via CyberNetwork L2. ERC-4337 enables seamless cross-chain experience without identity fragmentation.

Creators use EssenceNFT for collectible content and SubscribeNFT for paid/gated subscriptions. W3ST (Web3 Status Tokens) recognize community contributors as non-transferable ERC-1155 NFTs.

Both enable portable social identities, but CyberConnect focuses on full social graph infrastructure with monetization via NFTs/subscriptions. Farcaster emphasizes text broadcasting; CyberConnect powers diverse dApps like Link3, Phaver.

Yes, data is self-sovereign—users fully control their social graphs and can add/remove connections. On-chain storage ensures censorship resistance, with decentralized governance.

CYBER is the native governance token for protocol decisions and transactions. Total supply 100M, allocated for ecosystem incentives, community rewards, team, and sales.

Mint a CyberProfile NFT via Link3 on Ethereum (mainnet) or testnet. Use dApps like Phaver or ReadOn to post content, follow users, and mint NFTs representing interactions.

Is CyberConnect Worth It?

CyberConnect delivers robust web3 social infrastructure for portable identities and monetizable content across chains, powering 1.6M+ users and 14M+ transactions. Strong technical foundation with ERC-4337 and hybrid scaling, though adoption depends on dApp ecosystem growth. Ideal for developers building decentralized social experiences.

Recommended For

  • Web3 developers building social/NFT community apps
  • Creators seeking on-chain monetization (subscriptions, collectibles)
  • Projects needing cross-chain portable user identities
  • NFT communities wanting verifiable status/badges (W3ST)

!
Use With Caution

  • Users new to web3—requires wallet setup despite improved UX
  • High-gas environments—testnet recommended first
  • Centralized social teams—cultural shift to decentralized model

Not Recommended For

  • Web2-only teams without blockchain expertise
  • Budget-constrained project—there are costs to mainnet minting
  • Real time social need — blockchain latency
Expert's Conclusion

Web3-native social app developers who prioritize their users' ability to own their data and enable cross-chain interoperability in preference to web2’s simplicity, will be best served by CyberConnect.

Best For
Web3 developers building social/NFT community appsCreators seeking on-chain monetization (subscriptions, collectibles)Projects needing cross-chain portable user identities

What do expert reviews and research say about CyberConnect?

Key Findings

With its version 3 now live, CyberConnect is a mature web3 social protocol that supports over 1.6 million users, processes 14.7 million transactions per month and powers applications such as Link3 and Phaver using CyberAccount identities, CyberGraph data and NFT monetization capabilities. In addition, it offers support for multiple chains including Ethereum/Polygon/BNB and future Layer 2 (L2) support and has CYBER tokens that can be used to govern the network. CyberConnect also places a strong emphasis on enabling self-sovereign data as well as providing an easy onboarding experience.

Data Quality

Good - detailed technical info from official announcements, CoinMarketCap/Binance articles, docs.cyberconnect.me. Limited customer reviews/support data; private company with no G2 ratings.

Risk Factors

!
The reliance of CyberConnect on the EVM ecosystem and the costs associated with gas.
!
The competition from other social protocols such as Farcaster.
!
Barrier to mainstream adoption (onboarding wallets).
!
Volatility in token prices negatively affects ecosystem incentive mechanisms.
Last updated: February 2026

What Additional Information Is Available for CyberConnect?

Ecosystem dApps

Provides functionality to applications such as Link3 (verifiable identities), Phaver, and ReadOn with 1.6 million content items, 2.5 million followers, and 10.5 million NFT mints, to create diverse social experiences based on the same social graph.

Key Features

W3ST for community status (now ERC-1155 gas optimized), EssenceNFT / SubscribeNFT for monetization, and CyberProfile as ERC-721 owner of content/subscribers.

Partnerships

Collaborates with ZeroDev (account abstraction), ZetaChain (omnichain), StackUp/Pimlico (gasless bundlers) to provide seamless multi-chain social networks.

Tokenomics

The total supply of CYBER is 100M with 34% allocated to ecosystem incentives, 25% sold through private sale, and 15% retained by the team for use as incentives for transactions on CyberNetwork Layer 2.

Growth Metrics

There have been 1.3M unique wallet addresses, 14.7M on-chain transactions and 5.8M likes across the entire ecosystem. Version 3 increases scalability so that web3 social can be adopted globally.

What Are the Best Alternatives to CyberConnect?

  • •
    Farcaster: A decentralized social protocol, similar to email for web3, provides portable identities across clients, text broadcasting with NFT display. Simpler for messaging than CyberConnect's full graph/NFT monetization. Ideal for developers creating Twitter-like applications. (farcaster.xyz)
  • •
    Lens Protocol: The Social Graph is an NFT-based platform on Polygon that allows users to own their own data/profiles and content. Like CyberConnect it has a similar self-sovereign focus on user identity control. However, while CyberConnect is focused on being natively single-chained, this platform focuses on being a self-sovereign social graph natively on a single chain; best suited for individual creators/content platforms such as Lens (lens.xyz).
  • •
    ZetaChain CyberConnect Partnership: ZetaChain’s omnichain extension of CyberConnect will provide unified identities across all chains. This builds on CyberConnect to create greater compatibility across multiple chains for dApps that are interested in creating cross-chain social experiences (zetachain.com).
  • •
    Phaver: A social application built on top of CyberConnect – feeds/follows/NFT posts. This application provides an easier path into the world of CyberConnect for consumers who do not want to deal with the raw protocol directly. This is best for end-user adoption of the CyberConnect ecosystem (phaver.app).
  • •
    Link3: A CyberConnect dApp for minting and verifying user identities/badges, specifically for organizations/community profiles rather than a full social graph. This application is best suited for use by DAOs or other events (link3.to).

What Socialfi Reward Features Does CyberConnect Offer?

Engagement-Based Token Rewards

As users interact within the CyberConnect ecosystem they earn CYBER tokens and NFTs which can be redeemed for rewards such as interaction metrics and content engagement.

Creator Content NFTs

When a user creates content it is minted as an EssenceNFT and sent to their wallet along with on-chain IP rights and ownership using the CyberConnect protocol.

Creator Royalties on Secondary Sales

The CyberConnect protocol includes a royalty mechanism for when an NFT based piece of content is resold. This ensures that the original creator retains their earnings from the sale of the NFT on compatible blockchain networks.

Community Points Programs

W3ST (Web3 Status Tokens) are used as non-transferable ERC-1155 NFTs to reward community loyalty with verifiable status and increased discoverability.

Content Monetization Rights

All creators will retain full NFT ownership over their own profiles, content and subscription-based services allowing them to trade in the secondary market and maintain perpetual revenue streams.

Ephemeral NFT Campaigns

Badges/SBTs, etc., which represent limited time drops, such as collectible items or event attendance, can be created by dApps using the CyberConnect protocol for events, attendance verification and community campaigns.

What Core Platform Features Does CyberConnect Offer?

Crypto Wallet Integration

The CyberConnect protocol enables seamless wallet integration with ZeroDev, bundlers, and Paymaster systems, allowing for gasless transactions across blockchain networks.

User Profiles & Collections

CyberProfiles are customizable ERC-721 NFTs that display a users content, NFT collection, social connections, and W3ST badges.

Mobile Accessibility

The CyberConnect protocol will also allow for cross-platform support through various dApps such as Link3, and Phaver, with plans for web2-like onboarding via email/social login

Gamification Elements

Social Media Badges (W3ST), Achievements, Leader Boards Created by Community Issued Status NFTs Which Track Engagement & Contributions

Social Sharing Capabilities

Decentralized Social Graph Data Enabling Content Sharing & Connection Sharing Across The CyberConnect Ecosystem of DApps

Online Events & Spaces

Event Based NFT Drops, AMA Spaces & Community Campaigns Using EssenceNFT For Attendance Verification

Decentralized Governance

CYBER Token Governance Enables Holders To Vote On Protocol Development And Ecosystem Wide Decision Making

Creator Royalty Management

Automated Royalties on Secondary Sales of EssenceNFT and SubscribeNFT With On Chain Tracking Of Royalty Payments

What Nft Creator Monetization Pathways Does CyberConnect Offer?

Mint and Sell EssenceNFT Content Collectibles Directly Through Smart Contracts in The CyberConnect Protocol

Automatic Royalty Collection From NFT Resales of Profiles, Content and Subscriptions Indefinitely

Earning CYBER Governance Tokens Through Ecosystem Incentives For High Engaged Social Interactions

Exclusively Available, Limited Edition NFT Drops and W3ST Badges Only Available to Community Subscribers and Followers

Paid Sponsorship and Brand Partnerships Displayed to Creator Audiences for Additional Revenue

SubscribeNFT’s Allow Creators to Charge a Fee for Exclusive Access to Their Content and Communities

Allocations of CYBER Token From Ecosystem Treasury and Network Fees Distributed to Active Creators

Multi-Creator NFT Collections via Protocol Middleware with Shared Royalty Distribution

What Competitive Differentiation Factors Does CyberConnect Offer?

All Social Content, Profiles and Connections Owned as NFTs Via CyberGraph Providing Permanent Ownership Control Over IP

W3ST and EssenceNFT Campaigns Create Time-Limited Status Badges, Event Verification and Community Drops

Omnichain Social Graph Portable Across Chains and DApps Such as Link3, Phaver via CyberAccount Abstraction

CYBER Token Allows for Decentralized Protocol Governance and Long-Term Direction of Ecosystem

Gasless Transactions Reducing Minting Costs Through ERC-4337 Implementation of ERC-1155 W3ST

Decentralized, Self-Sovereign CyberAccount Separates Identity from Wallet with Social Recovery and Optional Disclosure

On-chain verified CyberProfiles and content provenance building collector trust

SubscribeNFT gated content and EssenceNFT collectibles with engagement-triggered utilities

Expert Reviews

📝

No reviews yet

Be the first to review CyberConnect!

Write a Review

Similar Products

Farcaster
farcaster.xyz
DeSo
deso.org
Friend.tech
friend.tech